Clark D A, Claybourn M
Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada.
Behav Res Ther. 1997 Dec;35(12):1139-41.
One hundred and twenty-five university students were administered a battery of self-report measures to assess worry disposition and content, frequency of obsessive intrusive thoughts, and 10 conceptually derived appraisal dimensions of worry and obsessional intrusions. Process ratings indicated that the worrisome thoughts were considered more disturbing than the ego-dystonic intrusive thoughts. Worry was also distinguished by a focus on the possible consequences of negative events, whereas concern about the personal meaning of the thought was a unique process dimension for obsessive intrusive thoughts. Both content and process variables are important in differentiating worry and obsessive-like intrusive thoughts in a nonclinical population.
对125名大学生进行了一系列自我报告测量，以评估担忧倾向和内容、强迫性侵入性思维的频率，以及从概念上推导出来的10个担忧和强迫性侵入的评估维度。过程评级表明，令人担忧的想法比自我不协调的侵入性想法更令人不安。担忧还具有关注负面事件可能后果的特点，而对想法个人意义的关注是强迫性侵入性思维独特的过程维度。在区分非临床人群的担忧和类似强迫的侵入性思维时，内容和过程变量都很重要。
