Brunetti D G, Schlottmann R S, Scott A B, Mihura J L
Oklahoma State University, USA.
J Clin Psychol. 1998 Feb;54(2):143-53. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199802)54:2<143::aid-jclp3>3.0.co;2-t.
Differences in Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) response latencies between groups instructed to respond honestly or fake were explored. There were 120 undergraduate students who completed a computer administered MMPI-2 with instructions to either respond honestly, to underreport psychopathology, or to overreport psychopathology. Results showed that subjects required significantly more time to respond in a manner that was inconsistent with their response set when pattern of endorsement (acceptance vs. rejection) was considered and less time when pattern of endorsement was not considered. The differential response of subjects across groups suggests that response latencies are related to response styles and that future research may indicate a methodology for utilizing response latencies in assessing response validity.
本研究探讨了明尼苏达多相人格量表第二版（MMPI - 2）中，接受诚实作答或伪装作答指示的不同组之间的反应潜伏期差异。共有120名本科生完成了计算机施测的MMPI - 2，他们分别接到诚实作答、少报精神病理学症状或多报精神病理学症状的指示。结果显示，当考虑认可模式（接受与拒绝）时，被试以与其反应定势不一致的方式作答所需时间显著更长；而不考虑认可模式时，所需时间则较短。不同组被试的差异反应表明，反应潜伏期与反应风格相关，未来研究可能会找到一种利用反应潜伏期评估反应效度的方法。
