• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对住院时间延长的危重症和晚期患者进行前瞻性伦理咨询的研究。

A study of proactive ethics consultation for critically and terminally ill patients with extended lengths of stay.

作者信息

Dowdy M D, Robertson C, Bander J A

机构信息

Bon Secours St. Mary's Hospital, Richmond, VA, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1998 Feb;26(2):252-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199802000-00020.

DOI:10.1097/00003246-199802000-00020
PMID:9468161
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of proactive ethics consultation on documented patient care communications and on decisions regarding high-risk intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

DESIGN

Prospective, controlled study.

PATIENTS

Ninety-nine ICU patients treated with >96 hrs of continuous mechanical ventilation.

INTERVENTIONS

Three groups were compared: a) a baseline group enrolled in the study prior to the establishment of the hospital's ethics consultation service; b) a control group where ethics consultation was at the option of the care team; and c) a treatment group where the ethics service intervened proactively after patients received >96 hrs of continuous mechanical ventilation. Patient care planning, for subjects in the proactive group, was reviewed with physicians and with the care team using a standardized set of prompting questions designed to focus discussion of key decision-making and communication issues for critically and terminally ill patients. Issues and concerns were identified and action strategies were suggested to those in charge of the patient's care. Formal ethics consultation, using a patient care conference model, was made available upon request.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Post discharge chart reviews of the three groups indicated no statistically significant differences on important demographic variables including age, gender, and acuity. Comparisons of survivors and nonsurvivors for the three groups indicated, at statistically significant levels, more frequent and documented communications, more frequent decisions to forego life-sustaining treatment, and reduced length of stay in the ICU for the proactive consultation group.

CONCLUSION

Proactive ethics consultation for high-risk patient populations offers a promising approach to improving decision-making and communication and reducing length of ICU stay for dying patients.

摘要

目的

评估前瞻性伦理咨询对已记录的患者护理沟通以及高危重症监护病房(ICU)患者决策的影响。

设计

前瞻性对照研究。

患者

99例接受持续机械通气超过96小时的ICU患者。

干预措施

比较三组:a)在医院伦理咨询服务建立之前纳入研究的基线组;b)护理团队可选择进行伦理咨询的对照组;c)患者接受持续机械通气超过96小时后伦理服务进行前瞻性干预的治疗组。对于前瞻性组的患者,使用一套标准化的提示性问题与医生和护理团队一起审查患者护理计划,这些问题旨在聚焦对危重症和终末期患者关键决策和沟通问题的讨论。识别问题和关注点,并向负责患者护理的人员建议行动策略。根据要求可通过患者护理会议模式进行正式的伦理咨询。

测量指标和主要结果

对三组患者出院后的病历审查表明,在包括年龄、性别和病情严重程度在内的重要人口统计学变量上,三组之间无统计学显著差异。对三组患者中幸存者和非幸存者的比较表明,在统计学显著水平上,前瞻性咨询组的沟通更频繁且有记录,放弃维持生命治疗的决策更频繁,ICU住院时间缩短。

结论

对高危患者群体进行前瞻性伦理咨询为改善决策和沟通以及缩短临终患者的ICU住院时间提供了一种有前景的方法。

相似文献

1
A study of proactive ethics consultation for critically and terminally ill patients with extended lengths of stay.对住院时间延长的危重症和晚期患者进行前瞻性伦理咨询的研究。
Crit Care Med. 1998 Feb;26(2):252-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199802000-00020.
2
Seeking to reduce nonbeneficial treatment in the ICU: an exploratory trial of proactive ethics intervention*.旨在减少 ICU 中的无益治疗:积极主动的伦理干预探索性试验*。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Apr;42(4):824-30. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000034.
3
Documentation of best interest by intensivists: a retrospective study in an Ontario critical care unit.重症监护医生记录最佳利益:安大略省重症监护病房的回顾性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2010 Feb 10;11:1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-11-1.
4
Preliminary report of the integration of a palliative care team into an intensive care unit.重症监护病房姑息治疗团队整合的初步报告。
Palliat Med. 2010 Mar;24(2):154-65. doi: 10.1177/0269216309346540. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
5
Private attending physician status and the withdrawal of life-sustaining interventions in a medical intensive care unit population.私立主治医师身份与医疗重症监护病房患者生命维持干预措施的撤除
Crit Care Med. 1996 Jun;24(6):968-75. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199606000-00016.
6
Withdrawing and withholding life support in the intensive care unit: a Spanish prospective multi-centre observational study.重症监护病房中撤除和停止生命支持:一项西班牙前瞻性多中心观察性研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Nov;27(11):1744-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-001-1111-7. Epub 2001 Oct 12.
7
[Ethics in intensive medicine].[重症医学中的伦理]
Anaesthesist. 1997 Apr;46(4):261-6. doi: 10.1007/s001010050399.
8
Proactive palliative care in the medical intensive care unit: effects on length of stay for selected high-risk patients.医学重症监护病房中的前瞻性姑息治疗:对特定高危患者住院时间的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Jun;35(6):1530-5. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000266533.06543.0C.
9
The effect of completing a surrogacy information and decision-making tool upon admission to an intensive care unit on length of stay and charges.完成一份代孕信息与决策工具对入住重症监护病房的住院时长及费用的影响。
J Clin Ethics. 2012 Summer;23(2):129-38.
10
High-risk intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: safety and outcome of the necessary "road trip".重症患者的高风险院内转运:必要“路途”的安全性与结局
Crit Care Med. 1995 Oct;23(10):1660-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199510000-00009.

引用本文的文献

1
Shared Decision-making in Palliative and End-of-life Care in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.心脏重症监护病房姑息治疗和临终关怀中的共同决策
US Cardiol. 2024 Sep 4;18:e13. doi: 10.15420/usc.2024.03. eCollection 2024.
2
It's Worth What You Can Sell It for: A Survey of Employment and Compensation Models for Clinical Ethicists.它的价值取决于你能卖多少钱:临床伦理学家的就业和薪酬模式调查。
HEC Forum. 2024 Sep;36(3):405-420. doi: 10.1007/s10730-023-09509-y. Epub 2023 Aug 5.
3
Clinical ethics consultations: a scoping review of reported outcomes.
临床伦理咨询:报告结果的范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Sep 27;23(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00832-6.
4
Palliative care interventions in intensive care unit patients.重症监护病房患者的姑息治疗干预措施。
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Dec;47(12):1415-1425. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06544-6. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
5
Framework for evaluation research on clinical ethical case interventions: the role of ethics consultants.临床伦理案例干预评估研究框架:伦理顾问的作用。
J Med Ethics. 2022 Jun;48(6):401-406. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107129. Epub 2021 May 18.
6
A Pilot Randomized Trial of an Interactive Web-based Tool to Support Surrogate Decision Makers in the Intensive Care Unit.一项交互式网络工具支持 ICU 替代决策制定者的初步随机试验
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 Jul;18(7):1191-1201. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202006-585OC.
7
Does Calculated Prognostic Estimation Lead to Different Outcomes Compared With Experience-Based Prognostication in the ICU? A Systematic Review.与重症监护病房中基于经验的预后判断相比,计算得出的预后估计是否会导致不同的结果?一项系统评价。
Crit Care Explor. 2019 Feb 1;1(2):e0004. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000004. eCollection 2019 Feb.
8
Developing the family support tool: An interactive, web-based tool to help families navigate the complexities of surrogate decision making in ICUs.开发家庭支持工具:一个互动的、基于网络的工具,帮助家庭在 ICU 中应对代理决策的复杂性。
J Crit Care. 2020 Apr;56:132-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.12.002. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
9
Clinical Ethics Needs Assessment: Adapting Clinical Ethics to a Population Health Program.临床伦理需求评估:使临床伦理适应人群健康项目
HEC Forum. 2020 Mar;32(1):21-32. doi: 10.1007/s10730-019-09386-4.
10
Ethical case interventions for adult patients.针对成年患者的伦理案例干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 22;7(7):CD012636. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012636.pub2.