• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A new scoring system for comparing the results of high-pass resolution perimetry and differential light sensitivity perimetry in glaucoma patients.

作者信息

Kono Y, Yamamoto T, Kitazawa Y

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Gifu University School of Medicine, Japan.

出版信息

Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1997 Oct;75(5):537-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.1997.tb00145.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0420.1997.tb00145.x
PMID:9469552
Abstract

Using a new standard, we compared the visual field defects detected by high-pass resolution perimetry (HRP) and differential light sensitivity (DLS) perimetry in 61 eyes of 61 open-angle glaucoma patients. Abnormal test points were determined using probability plot analysis of HRP and total deviation probability maps of the Humphrey Field Analyzer. To evaluate the agreement between the two tests, we developed a new scoring system. Thirty-three eyes, 23 eyes, and 5 eyes had good, fair, and poor agreement, respectively. In relation to Aulhorn's stage classification, the more advanced the glaucomatous stage, the more increased the percentages of good agreement. These results suggest that the distribution and severity of visual field defects demonstrated by HRP agree closely with those found using DLS perimetry in glaucomatous eyes, especially those with advanced visual field changes.

摘要

相似文献

1
A new scoring system for comparing the results of high-pass resolution perimetry and differential light sensitivity perimetry in glaucoma patients.
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1997 Oct;75(5):537-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.1997.tb00145.x.
2
Comparison of high-pass resolution perimetry and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
Am J Ophthalmol. 1995 Feb;119(2):195-201. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73873-5.
3
Detection of glaucomatous visual field defect by nonconventional perimetry.通过非常规视野检查法检测青光眼性视野缺损
Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jan;135(1):35-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01818-4.
4
Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss.多焦客观视野检查法在青光眼视野缺损检测中的应用
Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Jan;133(1):29-39. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(01)01294-6.
5
Comparison of conventional and high-pass resolution perimetry in a prospective study of patients with glaucoma and healthy controls.青光眼患者与健康对照者前瞻性研究中传统视野检查与高通分辨率视野检查的比较。
Arch Ophthalmol. 1999 Jan;117(1):24-33. doi: 10.1001/archopht.117.1.24.
6
Is visual field evaluation using multiple correlations and linear regressions useful? An evaluation of Delphi perimetry.使用多重相关性和线性回归进行视野评估有用吗?德尔菲视野计评估。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998 Jul;236(7):493-500. doi: 10.1007/s004170050111.
7
[Comparison of high-pass resolution perimetry and differential light sensitivity perimetry in glaucoma patients].青光眼患者高通分辨率视野检查与差分光敏感度视野检查的比较
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1993 May;97(5):644-8.
8
Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects.短波自动视野计、频率加倍技术视野计和图形视网膜电图用于预测青光眼性标准视野缺损的进展情况。
Ophthalmology. 2002 May;109(5):1009-17. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01015-1.
9
Evaluation of VEP perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.正常受试者和青光眼患者的视觉诱发电位视野检查评估。
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002 Dec;80(6):620-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2002.800612.x.
10
Interpretation of high-pass resolution perimetry with a probability plot.使用概率图解读高通分辨率视野检查法
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1995 Mar;233(3):140-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00166606.