Bergant A M, Nguyen T, Heim K, Ulmer H, Dapunt O
Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde, Universität Innsbruck.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1998 Jan 16;123(3):35-40. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1023895.
There is no valid method in the German literature for assessing postpartum depressive disorders. This study was undertaken to translate into German, validate and test the reliability of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS).
Randomly selected women after childbirth (n = 110) underwent (on the fourth postpartum day) a semistructured interview after first having answered the translated EPDS questionnaire. The diagnosis of depressive disorder was made according to the the criteria for psychological disorders in the ICD-10. For validation the results of the EPDS were compared with the clinical diagnosis of depression. The calculation of sensitivity, specificity and positive prognostic value was related to the respective EPDS results. In addition the EPDS data were analyses as to their reliability.
The average age of the tested women was 28.6 years; 72% were married and 45% were primiparae. For an EPDS total score threshold value of 9.5 the sensitivity was 0.96, the specificity 1.0, and a positive prognostic value of 1.0. In the reliability analysis for EPDS the Guttmann split-half reliability was 0.82 and the alpha-coefficient 0.81.
The German version of the EPDS with ten questions is an "application friendly" as well as proven to be a valid and reliable method for supporting the diagnosis of postpartum depressive disorder. It is suitable for both clinical and research use.
德国文献中尚无评估产后抑郁障碍的有效方法。本研究旨在将爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)翻译成德语,进行效度验证及信度测试。
随机选取产后妇女(n = 110),在产后第四天先回答翻译后的EPDS问卷,然后接受半结构化访谈。根据ICD - 10中精神障碍的标准进行抑郁障碍的诊断。为进行效度验证,将EPDS的结果与抑郁症的临床诊断进行比较。敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值的计算与各自的EPDS结果相关。此外,还对EPDS数据进行了信度分析。
受试女性的平均年龄为28.6岁;72%已婚,45%为初产妇。对于EPDS总分阈值9.5,敏感性为0.96,特异性为1.0,阳性预测值为1.0。在EPDS的信度分析中,古特曼折半信度为0.82,α系数为0.81。
有十个问题的德语版EPDS是一种“应用友好型”方法,已被证明是支持产后抑郁障碍诊断的有效且可靠的方法。它适用于临床和研究用途。