Simpson W M, Johnstone F D, Boyd F M, Goldberg D J, Hart G J, Prescott R J
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Edinburgh.
BMJ. 1998 Jan 24;316(7127):262-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7127.262.
To determine the uptake and acceptability of different methods of a universal offer of voluntary HIV testing to pregnant women.
Randomised controlled trial involving four combinations of written and verbal communication, followed by the direct offer of a test. The control group received no information and no direct offer of a test, although testing was available on request.
Hospital antenatal clinic covering most of the population of the city of Edinburgh.
3024 pregnant women booking at the clinic over a 10 month period.
Uptake of HIV testing and women's knowledge, satisfaction, and anxiety.
Uptake rates were 6% for those in the control group and 35% for those directly offered the test. Neither the style of leaflet nor the length of discussion had an effect on uptake. Significant independent predictors of uptake were a direct test offer; the midwife seen; and being unmarried, previously tested, and younger age. Knowledge of the specific benefits of testing increased with the amount of information given, but neither satisfaction nor anxiety was affected by the type of offer.
The universal offer of HIV testing is not intrusive and is acceptable to pregnant women. A policy of offering the HIV test to all women resulted in higher uptake and did not increase anxiety or dissatisfaction. Uptake depends more on the midwife than the method of offering the test. Low uptake rates and inadequate detection of HIV infection point to the need to assess a more routine approach to testing.
确定向孕妇普遍提供自愿性艾滋病毒检测的不同方法的接受情况和可接受性。
随机对照试验,涉及书面和口头交流的四种组合,随后直接提供检测。对照组未获得任何信息,也未被直接提供检测,不过可应要求进行检测。
覆盖爱丁堡市大部分人口的医院产前诊所。
在10个月期间到该诊所登记的3024名孕妇。
艾滋病毒检测的接受情况以及女性的知识、满意度和焦虑程度。
对照组的接受率为6%,直接获得检测的组接受率为35%。传单的样式和讨论的时长对接受率均无影响。接受检测的显著独立预测因素为直接提供检测、见到的助产士、未婚、曾接受过检测以及年龄较小。对检测具体益处的了解随所提供信息量的增加而增多,但提供检测的方式对满意度和焦虑程度均无影响。
普遍提供艾滋病毒检测并无侵扰性,孕妇可以接受。向所有女性提供艾滋病毒检测的政策导致接受率更高,且未增加焦虑或不满情绪。接受率更多地取决于助产士而非提供检测的方式。低接受率和艾滋病毒感染检测不足表明需要评估一种更常规的检测方法。