Flynn F V, Piper K A, Garcia-Webb P, McPherson K, Healy M J
Clin Chim Acta. 1976 Jul 1;70(1):179-89. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(76)90021-8.
The relative contributions of analytical error and non-systematic biological variation to the reference range for 19 commonly-determined blood chemistry values have been estimated during the course of studying 1000 healthy blood donors. Estimates of non-systematic biological variations are arrived at by determining the variation found in donors matched for factors known to affect blood chemistry such as age and sex, and deducting the within-batch analytical error which applied. Comparison of the within-batch and between-batch analytical precision with the biological variation showed that the percentage increases in the normal range attributable to between-batch analytical error varies between 1 and 29%. This contribution is particularly large in the case of the electrolytes and amounts to no less than 29% in the case of calcium. Apart from well-known relationships a remarkable lack of correlation between the concentration of the different constituents in health is demonstrated.
在对1000名健康献血者进行研究的过程中,已估算出分析误差和非系统性生物学变异对19种常用血液化学值参考范围的相对贡献。非系统性生物学变异的估算方法是,确定在年龄和性别等已知影响血液化学的因素方面匹配的献血者中发现的变异,并扣除所应用的批内分析误差。将批内和批间分析精密度与生物学变异进行比较,结果表明,批间分析误差导致正常范围增加的百分比在1%至29%之间。这种影响在电解质的情况下尤为显著,在钙的情况下高达29%。除了已知的关系外,还表明健康人群中不同成分的浓度之间明显缺乏相关性。