A smoke screen to keep the controversy alive.
作者信息
Vainio H, Sasco A J
出版信息
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997 Dec;23(6):401-2. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.261.
PMID:9476802
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
A smoke screen to keep the controversy alive.维持争议的烟幕。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997 Dec;23(6):401-2. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.261.
2
How the tobacco industry responded to an influential study of the health effects of secondhand smoke.烟草行业如何应对一项关于二手烟健康影响的有影响力的研究。
BMJ. 2002 Dec 14;325(7377):1413-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7377.1413.
3
Misleading information on environmental tobacco smoke in the French lay press.
Int J Epidemiol. 1997 Feb;26(1):240-1. doi: 10.1093/ije/26.1.240.
4
Passive smoking and health: should we believe Philip Morris's "experts"?被动吸烟与健康：我们应该相信菲利普·莫里斯公司的“专家”吗？
BMJ. 1996 Oct 12;313(7062):929-33. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7062.929.
5
Resisting smoke and spin.抵制烟雾和歪曲。
Lancet. 2000 Apr 8;355(9211):1197.
6
Who has the power over tobacco control?谁对烟草控制拥有权力？
Lancet. 2002 Jul 27;360(9329):267.
7
Setting the tobacco record straight?
Lancet. 2000 Jul 22;356(9226):336-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)73616-3.
8
Significance of workplace smoking.工作场所吸烟的意义。
Am J Public Health. 1998 Jul;88(7):1011-2. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.7.1011.
9
Tobacco: who pays whom?
Science. 1998 Sep 18;281(5384):1805-6.
10
[The tobacco industry and the manipulation of scientific investigation. The case of European study of IARC-WHO related to tobacco passive consumption and lung cancer].[烟草行业与科学调查的操纵。国际癌症研究机构-世界卫生组织关于烟草被动消费与肺癌的欧洲研究案例]
Med Clin (Barc). 2000 Sep 16;115(8):302-4. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(00)71541-7.
引用本文的文献
1
The impact of smoking on periodontal status and dental caries.吸烟对牙周状况和龋齿的影响。
Tob Induc Dis. 2022 Aug 29;20:72. doi: 10.18332/tid/152112. eCollection 2022.
Zotero 插件