How the tobacco industry responded to an influential study of the health effects of secondhand smoke.
作者信息
Hong Mi-Kyung, Bero Lisa A
机构信息
Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, Box 0613, San Francisco, CA 94143-0613, USA.
出版信息
BMJ. 2002 Dec 14;325(7377):1413-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7377.1413.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
How the tobacco industry responded to an influential study of the health effects of secondhand smoke.
BMJ. 2002 Dec 14;325(7377):1413-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7377.1413.
2
Tobacco wars. Research on secondhand smoke questioned.
Science. 2004 Nov 19;306(5700):1274. doi: 10.1126/science.306.5700.1274.
3
Secondhand smoke and statistical analysis.
CMAJ. 1999 Jan 26;160(2):180.
4
Changing conclusions on secondhand smoke in a sudden infant death syndrome review funded by the tobacco industry.
Pediatrics. 2005 Mar;115(3):e356-66. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1922.
5
A smoke screen to keep the controversy alive.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997 Dec;23(6):401-2. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.261.
6
Resisting smoke and spin.
Lancet. 2000 Apr 8;355(9211):1197.
7
Who has the power over tobacco control?
Lancet. 2002 Jul 27;360(9329):267.
8
Secondhand smoke exposure and risk of lung cancer in Japan: a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct;46(10):942-951. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyw091. Epub 2016 Aug 10.
9
Journal letters financed by tobacco industry.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Sep 2;90(17):1259. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.17.1259.
10
[The tobacco industry and the manipulation of scientific investigation. The case of European study of IARC-WHO related to tobacco passive consumption and lung cancer].
Med Clin (Barc). 2000 Sep 16;115(8):302-4. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(00)71541-7.
引用本文的文献
1
Tobacco industry influence on breast cancer research, policy and public opinion: scoping the Truth Tobacco Industry Documents.
Tob Control. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1136/tc-2024-058724.
2
Debate: What guidance is needed by academics who collaborate with digital companies to improve youth mental health?
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2025 Sep;30(3):313-316. doi: 10.1111/camh.12779. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
3
Developing structures to support researchers studying health-harming industries.
Health Promot Int. 2024 Dec 1;39(6). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae174.
4
The opioid industry's use of scientific evidence to advance claims about prescription opioid safety and effectiveness.
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Oct 24;2(10):qxae119. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae119. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
The science of spin: targeted strategies to manufacture doubt with detrimental effects on environmental and public health.
Environ Health. 2021 Mar 26;20(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12940-021-00723-0.
6
Highly Sensitive Gas Sensing Material for Environmentally Toxic Gases Based on Janus NbSeTe Monolayer.
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020 Dec 19;10(12):2554. doi: 10.3390/nano10122554.
7
Impact of the WHO FCTC over the first decade: a global evidence review prepared for the Impact Assessment Expert Group.
Tob Control. 2019 Jun;28(Suppl 2):s119-s128. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054389. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
8
New Policy of the Journal of Epidemiology Regarding the Relationship With the Tobacco Industry.
J Epidemiol. 2018 Jan 5;28(1):1-2. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20170187. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
9
"The Policy Dystopia Model": Implications for Health Advocates and Democratic Governance.
PLoS Med. 2016 Sep 20;13(9):e1002126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002126. eCollection 2016 Sep.
10
Tobacco company efforts to influence the Food and Drug Administration-commissioned Institute of Medicine report clearing the smoke: an analysis of documents released through litigation.
PLoS Med. 2013;10(5):e1001450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001450. Epub 2013 May 28.
本文引用的文献
1
Evaluating public commentary and scientific evidence submitted in the development of a risk assessment.
Risk Anal. 2002 Feb;22(1):131-40. doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.t01-1-00011.
2
Science in regulatory policy making: case studies in the development of workplace smoking restrictions.
Tob Control. 2001 Dec;10(4):329-36. doi: 10.1136/tc.10.4.329.
3
The smoke you don't see: uncovering tobacco industry scientific strategies aimed against environmental tobacco smoke policies.
Am J Public Health. 2001 Sep;91(9):1419-23. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.9.1419.
4
Tobacco industry efforts at discrediting scientific knowledge of environmental tobacco smoke: a review of internal industry documents.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Aug;55(8):588-94. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.8.588.
5
Publication bias and research on passive smoking: comparison of published and unpublished studies.
JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):250-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.3.250.
6
When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable.
JAMA. 1997 Aug 20;278(7):579-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.278.7.579.
7
Authorship: time for a paradigm shift?
BMJ. 1997 Apr 5;314(7086):992. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7086.992.
8
Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: an analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996 Fall;21(3):515-42. doi: 10.1215/03616878-21-3-515.
9
Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
JAMA. 1993 May 5;269(17):2282-6.
10
"Marriage to a smoker" may not be a valid marker of exposure in studies relating environmental tobacco smoke to risk of lung cancer in Japanese non-smoking women.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1995;67(5):287-94. doi: 10.1007/BF00385642.
Zotero 插件