被动吸烟与健康：我们应该相信菲利普·莫里斯公司的“专家”吗？ - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Passive smoking and health: should we believe Philip Morris's "experts"?

作者信息

Smith G D, Phillips A N

机构信息

University of Bristol, Department of Social Medicine.

出版信息

BMJ. 1996 Oct 12;313(7062):929-33. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7062.929.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.313.7062.929

PMID:8876102

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2352249/

Abstract

摘要

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c15e/2352249/a47fbbf55520/bmj00563-0045-a.jpg

相似文献

Passive smoking and health: should we believe Philip Morris's "experts"?被动吸烟与健康：我们应该相信菲利普·莫里斯公司的“专家”吗？

BMJ. 1996 Oct 12;313(7062):929-33. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7062.929.

Understanding Philip Morris's pursuit of US government regulation of tobacco.解读菲利普·莫里斯公司对美国政府烟草监管的追求。

Tob Control. 2005 Jun;14(3):193-200. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.009878.

Campaign to counter a deteriorating consumer market: Philip Morris's Project Sunrise.应对不断恶化的消费市场的活动：菲利普莫里斯的“日出计划”。

Public Health. 2013 Feb;127(2):134-42. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2012.11.013. Epub 2013 Jan 22.

Philip Morris's website and television commercials use new language to mislead the public into believing it has changed its stance on smoking and disease.菲利普·莫里斯公司的网站和电视广告使用新的措辞来误导公众，使其相信该公司已改变对吸烟与疾病的立场。

Tob Control. 2007 Dec;16(6):e9. doi: 10.1136/tc.2007.024026.

Invited commentary: confounding, measurement error, and publication bias in studies of passive smoking.特邀评论：被动吸烟研究中的混杂因素、测量误差和发表偏倚

Am J Epidemiol. 1996 Nov 15;144(10):909-15. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008860.

A smoke screen to keep the controversy alive.维持争议的烟幕。

Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997 Dec;23(6):401-2. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.261.

Lung cancer and passive smoking. Scales for visual test of publication bias are unfair.肺癌与被动吸烟。用于检验发表偏倚的视觉测试量表并不公平。

BMJ. 2000 Nov 11;321(7270):1222-3.

Lung Cancer and passive smoking. Increased risk is not disputed.肺癌与被动吸烟。风险增加这一点并无争议。

BMJ. 2000 Nov 11;321(7270):1221-2; author reply 1222-3.

Lung cancer and passive smoking. Nothing new was said.肺癌与被动吸烟。没什么新内容。

BMJ. 2000 Nov 11;321(7270):1222; author reply 1222-3.

Lung cancer and passive smoking. Turning over the wrong stone.肺癌与被动吸烟。找错了方向。

BMJ. 2000 Nov 11;321(7270):1221; author reply 1222-3.

引用本文的文献

Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and risk of lung cancer in Montreal: a case-control study.蒙特利尔地区环境烟草烟雾暴露与肺癌风险：一项病例对照研究。

Environ Health. 2013 Dec 18;12:112. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-12-112.

Effect of passive smoking on health.被动吸烟对健康的影响。

BMJ. 2003 May 17;326(7398):1048-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7398.1048.

[Report on passive smoking].[关于被动吸烟的报告]

Aten Primaria. 2003 Feb 28;31(3):181-90. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(03)70680-5.

Constructing "sound science" and "good epidemiology": tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms.构建“可靠科学”与“良好流行病学”：烟草、律师与公关公司

Am J Public Health. 2001 Nov;91(11):1749-57. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.11.1749.

Why journals should not publish articles funded by the tobacco industry.为何期刊不应发表由烟草行业资助的文章。

BMJ. 2000 Oct 28;321(7268):1074-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7268.1074.

本文引用的文献

Children and smoking: the family circle.儿童与吸烟：家庭环境

Br Med Bull. 1996 Jan;52(1):90-107. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a011535.

Environmental tobacco smoke.环境烟草烟雾

Br Med Bull. 1996 Jan;52(1):22-34. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a011528.

Misclassification of smoking habits as a source of bias in the study of environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer.在环境烟草烟雾与肺癌研究中，将吸烟习惯误分类作为偏差来源。

Stat Med. 1996 Mar 30;15(6):581-605. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960330)15:6<581::AID-SIM182>3.0.CO;2-B.

Epidemiology versus a smoke screen.流行病学与烟幕弹

Lancet. 1996 Aug 10;348(9024):410. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)65031-3.

Smoking and the sudden infant death syndrome: results from 1993-5 case-control study for confidential inquiry into stillbirths and deaths in infancy. Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths Regional Coordinators and Researchers.吸烟与婴儿猝死综合征：1993 - 1995年死产和婴儿死亡秘密调查病例对照研究结果。死产和死亡秘密调查区域协调员及研究人员。

BMJ. 1996 Jul 27;313(7051):195-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7051.195.

Inflation in epidemiology: "the proof and measurement of association between two things" revisited.流行病学中的Inflation：重温“两件事之间关联的证明与测量”

BMJ. 1996 Jun 29;312(7047):1659-61. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7047.1659.

Flavonoid intake and coronary mortality. Objective data trials are needed.黄酮类化合物的摄入量与冠心病死亡率。需要客观数据试验。

BMJ. 1996 Jun 8;312(7044):1479-80. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7044.1479c.

Effects of a combination of beta carotene and vitamin A on lung cancer and cardiovascular disease.β-胡萝卜素与维生素A联合使用对肺癌和心血管疾病的影响。

N Engl J Med. 1996 May 2;334(18):1150-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199605023341802.

Lack of effect of long-term supplementation with beta carotene on the incidence of malignant neoplasms and cardiovascular disease.长期补充β-胡萝卜素对恶性肿瘤和心血管疾病发病率无影响。

N Engl J Med. 1996 May 2;334(18):1145-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199605023341801.

"Marriage to a smoker" may not be a valid marker of exposure in studies relating environmental tobacco smoke to risk of lung cancer in Japanese non-smoking women.在关于环境烟草烟雾与日本非吸烟女性肺癌风险关系的研究中，“与吸烟者结婚”可能并非暴露情况的有效指标。

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1995;67(5):287-94. doi: 10.1007/BF00385642.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验