Stechmann A, Schlegel M, Lynn D H
Universität Leipzig, Institut für Zoologie/Spezielle Zoologie, Germany.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1998 Feb;9(1):48-54. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1997.0435.
We analyzed the phylogenetic relationships among the four ciliate classes, Prostomatea, Colpodea, Nassophorea, and Litostomatea, by small subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequence comparison to test several phylogenetic hypotheses that had been proposed for these classes, based on ultrastructural features. The complete coding regions of the prostomes, Prorodon teres and Coleps hirtus, and of the colpodean, Bursaria truncatella, were determined and compared to the database and the literature. The prostomes and colpodeans are strongly supported as monophyletic groups in all analyses. A sister-group relationship between prostomes and colpodeans is strongly supported by parsimony analyses and moderately supported by distance matrix analyses. There was no support for a close relationship between colpodeans and nassophoreans or between colpodeans and litostomes. In all analyses, these four classes branch late in the ciliate tree. This finding further supports the new view of ciliate phylogeny that so-called ancestral taxa, such as the "primitive" prostomes, are in fact derived and that so-called "highly evolved" groups, such as the heterotrichs, branch off very early in the ciliate tree.
我们通过小亚基核糖体RNA基因序列比较,分析了原口纲、肾形纲、 Nassophorea和膜口纲这四个纤毛虫纲之间的系统发育关系,以检验基于超微结构特征为这些纲提出的几个系统发育假说。测定了原口虫Prorodon teres和Coleps hirtus以及肾形虫Bursaria truncatella的完整编码区,并与数据库和文献进行了比较。在所有分析中,原口虫和肾形虫都被有力地支持为单系类群。简约分析强烈支持原口虫和肾形虫之间的姐妹群关系,距离矩阵分析则适度支持这一关系。没有证据支持肾形虫与 Nassophorea或肾形虫与膜口虫之间存在密切关系。在所有分析中,这四个纲在纤毛虫树中分支较晚。这一发现进一步支持了纤毛虫系统发育的新观点,即所谓的祖先类群,如“原始”的原口虫,实际上是衍生而来的,而所谓的“高度进化”的类群,如异毛类,在纤毛虫树中很早就分支了。