Lundvall J, Lindgren P
Department of Clinical Physiology, Växjö Hospital, 351 85 Växjö, Sweden.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998 Mar;84(3):822-9. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1998.84.3.822.
Numerous studies have focused on alterations in plasma volume (PV) on interventions like quiet standing, exercise, or heat stress. However, no method seems capable of truly estimating the PV alteration. Therefore, an attempt was made to validate commonly used indexes of PV changes. Quiet standing was used to cause graded PV reductions estimated from hemoglobin and hematocrit (Hb/Hct) and from serum concentrations of total protein, albumin, and "large proteins" (LP; total protein minus albumin). Results indicated the following. 1) Hb/Hct, with the merit that the marker (erythrocyte) stays within the circulation, reflect accurately a small-to-moderate PV loss (</=10% of control PV). At large PV decrease (>/=15-20% of control), however, F-cell shift can cause Hb/Hct to underestimate the response by up to 25-30%. 2) Albumin and total protein underrate PV loss due to protein escape (mainly albumin) from the circulation. 3) LP also underestimate the PV decline due to protein escape but can often predict large PV reductions clearly better than Hb/Hct. 4) Prolonged standing can lead to pronounced 25% PV decline.
许多研究聚焦于诸如安静站立、运动或热应激等干预措施下血浆容量(PV)的变化。然而,似乎没有方法能够真正估算PV的变化。因此,有人尝试验证常用的PV变化指标。采用安静站立来引发PV的分级降低,通过血红蛋白和血细胞比容(Hb/Hct)以及总蛋白、白蛋白和“大分子蛋白”(LP;总蛋白减去白蛋白)的血清浓度来估算。结果如下:1)Hb/Hct的优点是标记物(红细胞)留在循环系统中,能准确反映小到中度的PV损失(≤对照PV的10%)。然而,在PV大幅降低时(≥对照PV的15 - 20%),F细胞转移会导致Hb/Hct低估反应达25 - 30%。2)白蛋白和总蛋白会低估由于蛋白质(主要是白蛋白)从循环中逸出导致的PV损失。3)LP同样会低估由于蛋白质逸出导致的PV下降,但通常比Hb/Hct能更清楚地预测较大的PV降低。4)长时间站立可导致PV显著下降25%。