Suppr超能文献

依据1983年《精神健康法》第5(2)条对住院患者的拘留。

Detention of in-patients under section 5(2) of the Mental Health Act 1983.

作者信息

Salib E, Iparragirre B

机构信息

Winwick Hospital, Warrington Community Health Care (NHS) Trust, Cheshire.

出版信息

Med Sci Law. 1998 Jan;38(1):10-6. doi: 10.1177/002580249803800103.

Abstract

All applications of s.5(2) of the Mental Health Act 1983, allowing the emergency detention of voluntary in-patients in North Cheshire between 1985 and 1995, were reviewed to examine general trends in its use and to assess variables likely to influence its outcome. Of the 877 applications implemented (4% of all admissions), 500 (57%) were converted to longer-term detention under the Act, 396 (45%) were converted to s.2 and 104 (12%) to s.3. The other 377 (43%) detained patients under s.5(2) regained informal status. The review found that time of application of section, length of hospital stay prior to application, medical officer's grade, use of s.5(4) and clinical diagnosis are best predictors of s.5(2) outcome. The results are similar to other published studies and seem to reflect a national pattern, possibly implying that patients detained under this short-term detention order have an almost equal chance of either regaining their voluntary status or being detained under another section by the end of the 72 hours. This may raise questions about the purpose of s.5(2) as expressed by the Mental Health Act Commission.

摘要

对1983年《精神健康法》第5(2)条在1985年至1995年间允许对北柴郡的自愿住院患者进行紧急拘留的所有应用情况进行了审查,以研究其使用的总体趋势,并评估可能影响其结果的变量。在实施的877份申请中(占所有入院人数的4%),500份(57%)根据该法转为长期拘留,396份(45%)转为第2条规定的拘留,104份(12%)转为第3条规定的拘留。其他377名(43%)根据第5(2)条被拘留的患者恢复了非正式身份。审查发现,申请时间、申请前的住院时间、医务人员的级别、第5(4)条的使用情况和临床诊断是第5(2)条结果的最佳预测因素。结果与其他已发表的研究相似,似乎反映了一种全国性模式,这可能意味着根据这一短期拘留令被拘留的患者在72小时结束时恢复其自愿身份或根据另一条款被拘留的机会几乎相等。这可能会引发关于精神健康法委员会所表达的第5(2)条目的的问题。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验