Coccaro E F, Berman M E, Kavoussi R J
Department of Psychiatry, MCP Hahnemann School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19129, USA.
Psychiatry Res. 1997 Dec 5;73(3):147-57. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(97)00119-4.
The Life History of Aggression (LHA) assessment was administered to up to 252 subjects. In addition to a total LHA score, subscale scores for Aggression, Social Consequences and Antisocial Behavior, and Self-directed Aggression were calculated. Test-retest stability, interrater agreement, and internal consistency reliability were excellent both for the LHA Total score and the LHA Aggression subscore. There were moderately strong correlations between these scores and both self-reports of aggressive tendency (Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory: n = 214) and recent overt aggression (Overt Aggression Scale-Modified for Out-patients: n = 61). LHA Total scores were highest among subjects with Antisocial or Borderline Personality Disorder. These results support the use of the LHA assessment, and especially the LHA Aggression subscore, as a measure of life history of aggressive behavior.
对多达252名受试者进行了攻击性行为生活史(LHA)评估。除了LHA总分外,还计算了攻击、社会后果与反社会行为以及自我导向攻击的子量表分数。LHA总分和LHA攻击性子量表分数的重测稳定性、评分者间一致性和内部一致性信度都非常好。这些分数与攻击倾向的自我报告(布斯-杜克敌意量表:n = 214)和近期明显攻击行为(门诊患者改良版明显攻击量表:n = 61)之间存在中等强度的相关性。反社会或边缘型人格障碍受试者的LHA总分最高。这些结果支持将LHA评估,尤其是LHA攻击性子量表分数,用作攻击性行为生活史的一种测量方法。