Suppr超能文献

全国范围内家庭输血实践调查。

Nationwide survey of home transfusion practices.

作者信息

Benson K, Popovsky M A, Hines D, Hume H, Oberman H A, Glassman A B, Pisciotto P T, Thurer R L, Stehling L, Anderson K C

机构信息

H. Lee Moffit Cancer Center and the University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa 33612, USA.

出版信息

Transfusion. 1998 Jan;38(1):90-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1998.38198141505.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited information exists on home transfusion practices.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In 1995, a survey requesting data for 1994 was sent to 1273 American Association of Blood Banks (AABB) institutional members and 113 non-AABB home health care agencies that provide out-of-hospital transfusions.

RESULTS

Of 943 respondents, 102 provide blood to a home transfusion program, 37 provide blood and run a home transfusion program, and 13 run a home transfusion program only, for a total of 152 (16%) with some involvement in home blood transfusions. Most of the 50 respondents with a home transfusion program are licensed by their state and accredited by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. All respondents have written policies for home transfusion, and 90 percent require a signed informed-consent document before initiating transfusions in the home. Most have policies requiring that there be a second adult and a telephone in the home, that the home be deemed safe for transfusion, that the patient's physician be readily available, and that the patient have had prior transfusions. The most common component issued by the blood providers was red cells, followed by platelets. White cell-reduced components were always provided by 36 percent of respondents. The most common patient diagnosis was cancer. Home transfusions were provided primarily by registered nurses. Only 14 percent of respondents indicated that the medical director of the blood bank is responsible for approving a patient for home transfusion. A posttransfusion visit is performed by 46 percent of respondents.

CONCLUSION

Although most facilities have policies for the administration of home transfusions, there remains marked heterogeneity among blood providers and transfusionists regarding home transfusion practices.

摘要

背景

关于家庭输血实践的信息有限。

研究设计与方法

1995年,向1273家美国血库协会(AABB)机构成员以及113家提供院外输血服务的非AABB家庭保健机构发送了一份要求提供1994年数据的调查问卷。

结果

在943名受访者中,102家向家庭输血项目供血,37家供血并运营家庭输血项目,13家仅运营家庭输血项目,总计152家(16%)在一定程度上参与家庭输血。50家有家庭输血项目的受访者中,大多数获得所在州的许可并通过医疗机构评审联合委员会的认证。所有受访者都有家庭输血的书面政策,90%要求在开始家庭输血前签署知情同意文件。大多数政策要求家中有第二名成年人和一部电话,家庭被认为适合输血,患者的医生随时可联系到,且患者曾接受过输血。血液供应者提供最多的成分是红细胞,其次是血小板。36%的受访者总是提供白细胞减少的成分。最常见的患者诊断是癌症。家庭输血主要由注册护士进行。只有14%的受访者表示血库的医学主任负责批准患者进行家庭输血。46%的受访者进行输血后随访。

结论

尽管大多数机构有家庭输血管理政策,但在血液供应者和输血者的家庭输血实践方面仍存在显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验