Verran J, Winder C, McCord J F, Maryan C J
Department of Biological Sciences, Manchester Metropolitan University, United Kingdom.
Int J Prosthodont. 1997 May-Jun;10(3):283-6.
This research sought to compare the microbiological status of pumice slurry in clinical and nonclinical dental laboratories. Samples were inoculated onto selective and nonselective media. Resultant colonies were counted and identified to genus or species level. In the nonclinical laboratory, counts were constant at approximately 10(7) to 10(8) cfu/g. Pseudomonads, staphylococci and Bacillus spp comprised the major pumice contaminants in both laboratories. It was concluded that nonclinical laboratories are not immune from the presence of potentially pathogenic microorganisms in pumice slurry. Disinfection reduces contamination by oral microorganisms.
本研究旨在比较临床和非临床牙科实验室中浮石浆的微生物状况。将样本接种到选择性和非选择性培养基上。对所得菌落进行计数并鉴定到属或种水平。在非临床实验室中,菌落计数稳定在约10(7)至10(8) cfu/g。假单胞菌、葡萄球菌和芽孢杆菌属是两个实验室中浮石的主要污染物。得出的结论是,非临床实验室不能免于浮石浆中潜在致病微生物的存在。消毒可减少口腔微生物的污染。