de Souza Tricia Murielly Pereira Andrade, de Castro Ricardo Dias, de Vasconcelos Laís César, Pontual Andréa Dos Anjos, de Moraes Ramos Perez Flávia Maria, Pontual Maria Luiza Dos Anjos
Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE), Av. Professor Morais Rego, 1235, Cidade Universitária, Recife, Recife, Pernambuco, 50670-901, Brazil.
Phonoaudiology Department, Federal University of Paraíba, Cidade Universitária, - Castelo Branco, João Pessoa, Paraiba, João Pessoa, 58051-900, Brazil.
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jan;21(1):301-307. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1790-7. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
The aims of this study were to evaluate microbial contamination in phosphor storage plates in dental radiology services and discuss the possible origin of this contamination.
The sample comprised 50 phosphor plates: 14 plates from service A, 30 from service B, and 6 in the control group, consisting of plates never used. Damp sterile swabs were rubbed on the phosphor plates, and then transferred to tests tubes containing sterile saline solution. Serial dilutions were made, and then inoculated in triplicate on Mueller Hinton agar plates and incubated at 37 °C/48 h, before counting the colony-forming units (CFU). The samples were also seeded in brain-heart infusion medium to confirm contamination by turbidity of the culture medium. All solutions, turbid and clean, were seeded in selective and non-selective media.
At service A and B, 50 and 73.3 % of the phosphor plates were contaminated, respectively. This contamination was mainly due to bacteria of the genus Staphylococcus. CFU counts ranged from 26.4 to 80.0 CFU/plate.
Most of the phosphor plates evaluated shown to be contaminated, mainly by Staphylococcus ssp. Quantitatively, this contamination occurred at low levels, possibly arising from handling of the plates. The use of a second plastic barrier may have diminished contamination by microorganisms from the oral cavity.
There is a risk of cross-contamination by phosphor storage plates used in dental radiology services.
本研究旨在评估牙科放射科磷光存储板的微生物污染情况,并探讨这种污染的可能来源。
样本包括50块磷光板:来自A科室的14块、B科室的30块,以及6块作为对照组,由从未使用过的板组成。用潮湿的无菌拭子擦拭磷光板,然后转移到装有无菌盐溶液的试管中。进行系列稀释,然后一式三份接种在穆勒-欣顿琼脂平板上,于37°C孵育48小时,之后计算菌落形成单位(CFU)。样本还接种于脑心浸液培养基中,通过培养基浑浊度确认污染情况。所有溶液,无论浑浊与否,均接种于选择性和非选择性培养基中。
在A科室和B科室,分别有50%和73.3%的磷光板被污染。这种污染主要是由葡萄球菌属细菌引起的。CFU计数范围为每板26.4至80.0 CFU。
所评估的大多数磷光板显示被污染,主要是被葡萄球菌属污染。从数量上看,这种污染程度较低,可能源于对板的处理。使用第二层塑料屏障可能减少了口腔微生物的污染。
牙科放射科使用的磷光存储板存在交叉污染的风险。