Eduard W, Heederik D
National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1998 Feb;59(2):113-27. doi: 10.1080/15428119891010370.
Exposure to high airborne levels of noninfectious microorganisms is recognized as a cause of respiratory symptoms and disease among workers handling biological materials, such as farmers, sawmill workers, and workers handling municipal waste and fuel chips. Risk assessment is difficult because occupational exposure limits for noninfectious microorganisms have not been established. Many different methods are used for the measurement of airborne microorganisms, which are based on impaction, impingement, or filtration. Samples can be analyzed by methods that are culture-based or nonculture-based and that may estimate different microbial entities: culturable microorganisms by culture-based methods, microbial cells by microscopic methods, and microbial constituents and products by chemical, biochemical and immunochemical methods. Sources of errors and validation studies of these methods are reviewed and methods are evaluated for exposure assessment in epidemiological studies and for future compliance testing. At present it is not clear which microbial bioaerosol components should be assessed. Culture-based methods are probably not satisfactory because nonviable microorganisms and microbial constituents and products also may cause health effects. Culture-based methods are poor surrogates for nonculture-based methods and have poor precision. However, identification of microorganisms is most readily performed by culture-based methods. Filter sampling is preferred for personal exposure measurements because filters can be analyzed by a variety of nonculture-based methods, and filter sampling may be adapted to recently adopted criteria for health-related size fractions.
在处理生物材料的工人中,如农民、锯木厂工人以及处理城市垃圾和燃料木屑的工人,接触空气中高浓度的非传染性微生物被认为是导致呼吸道症状和疾病的一个原因。风险评估很困难,因为尚未制定非传染性微生物的职业接触限值。许多不同的方法用于测量空气中的微生物,这些方法基于撞击、冲击或过滤。样品可以通过基于培养或非基于培养的方法进行分析,这些方法可能估计不同的微生物实体:通过基于培养的方法估计可培养微生物,通过显微镜方法估计微生物细胞,以及通过化学、生化和免疫化学方法估计微生物成分和产物。本文综述了这些方法的误差来源和验证研究,并对这些方法在流行病学研究中的暴露评估以及未来的合规性测试进行了评估。目前尚不清楚应评估哪些微生物生物气溶胶成分。基于培养的方法可能并不令人满意,因为无活力的微生物以及微生物成分和产物也可能对健康产生影响。基于培养的方法是基于非培养方法的较差替代方法,且精度较低。然而,微生物的鉴定最容易通过基于培养的方法进行。对于个人暴露测量,过滤采样是首选,因为过滤器可以通过多种非基于培养的方法进行分析,并且过滤采样可以适应最近采用的与健康相关的粒径分级标准。