Ma J, Maliepaard M, Nooter K, Boersma A W, Verweij J, Stoter G, Schellens J H
Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam Cancer Institute (Daniel den Hoed Kliniek)/University Hospital, The Netherlands.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1998;41(4):307-16. doi: 10.1007/s002800050744.
The cytotoxicity of cisplatin alone and in combination with topotecan (TPT) or SN-38, two novel topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitors, was determined in a panel of eight well-characterized human solid-tumor cell lines. Interactions between cisplatin and these topo I inhibitors were investigated using three different administration schedules: (1) simultaneous incubation (C + T and C + S), (2) cisplatin followed by TPT or SN-38 (C --> T and C --> S), and (3) TPT or SN-38 followed by cisplatin (T --> C and S --> C). Median-effect analysis revealed synergistic cytotoxicity in seven of the eight cell lines used. In addition, a significant schedule-dependent synergistic cytotoxicity was found in three of the cell lines used, with C --> T (or C --> S) being the most active schedule. The formation and repair of total cisplatin-DNA adducts in the IGROV-1 ovarian cancer cell line and its cisplatin-resistant subline IGROV(CDDP) was not significantly affected by TPT on simultaneous incubation. In contrast, the number of cisplatin-DNA interstrand cross-links detected in the IGROV-1 and IGROV(CDDP) lines at certain time points was significantly lower after coincubation of the cells with TPT. Assessment of the cell-cycle distribution revealed an accumulation of cells in the G2/M phase after exposure to cisplatin. After exposure to TPT a different pattern was observed that was cell-type-specific and dependent upon the TPT concentration. Although up to 4-fold differences in topo I activity were observed in this panel of cell lines, these differences did not appear to be related to the synergy observed between cisplatin and TPT or SN-38. The observed synergy may at least partly be explained by the increased retention of cisplatin-DNA interstrand cross-links in the presence of topo I inhibitors.
在一组八个特征明确的人实体瘤细胞系中,测定了顺铂单独使用以及与两种新型拓扑异构酶I(拓扑酶I)抑制剂拓扑替康(TPT)或SN - 38联合使用时的细胞毒性。使用三种不同的给药方案研究了顺铂与这些拓扑酶I抑制剂之间的相互作用:(1)同时孵育(C + T和C + S),(2)顺铂后接TPT或SN - 38(C→T和C→S),以及(3)TPT或SN - 38后接顺铂(T→C和S→C)。中位效应分析显示,在所使用的八个细胞系中的七个中存在协同细胞毒性。此外,在所使用的三个细胞系中发现了显著的给药方案依赖性协同细胞毒性,其中C→T(或C→S)是最有效的给药方案。在IGROV - 1卵巢癌细胞系及其顺铂耐药亚系IGROV(CDDP)中,同时孵育时TPT对总顺铂 - DNA加合物的形成和修复没有显著影响。相反,在细胞与TPT共同孵育后,在特定时间点在IGROV - 1和IGROV(CDDP)细胞系中检测到的顺铂 - DNA链间交联数量显著降低。细胞周期分布评估显示,暴露于顺铂后细胞在G2/M期积累。暴露于TPT后观察到不同的模式,这是细胞类型特异性的且取决于TPT浓度。尽管在这组细胞系中观察到拓扑酶I活性存在高达4倍的差异,但这些差异似乎与顺铂和TPT或SN - 38之间观察到的协同作用无关。观察到的协同作用至少部分可以通过在拓扑酶I抑制剂存在下顺铂 - DNA链间交联的保留增加来解释。