Borkovec T D, Castonguay L G
Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802, USA.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998 Feb;66(1):136-42. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.66.1.136.
It is important to define precisely what is and is not meant by "empirically supported treatments," rigorously based on what is actually known about the nature of experimental therapy research. The criteria for empirically supported treatments merely allow conclusions about whether treatments cause any change beyond the causative effect of such factors as placebo or the passage of time. Applied implications are limited, due to external validity and to the fact that applied decisions are influenced by cost-benefit analyses. Creating increasingly effective therapies through between-group designs is best done by controlled trials specifically aimed at basic questions about the nature of psychological problems and the nature of therapeutic change mechanisms. Naturalistic research is important for external validity but is valuable only if it uses scientifically valid methods to address basic knowledge questions.
基于对实验性治疗研究本质的实际了解,准确界定“实证支持治疗”的含义及非含义非常重要。实证支持治疗的标准仅允许得出关于治疗是否会产生超出安慰剂或时间推移等因素的因果效应之外的任何变化的结论。由于外部效度以及应用决策受成本效益分析影响这一事实,其应用意义有限。通过组间设计创建越来越有效的疗法,最好通过专门针对有关心理问题本质和治疗改变机制本质的基本问题的对照试验来完成。自然主义研究对于外部效度很重要,但只有在使用科学有效的方法来解决基础知识问题时才具有价值。