Diez-Roux A V
Division of General Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA.
Am J Public Health. 1998 Feb;88(2):216-22. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.2.216.
A large portion of current epidemiologic research is based on methodologic individualism: the notion that the distribution of health and disease in populations can be explained exclusively in terms of the characteristics of individuals. The present paper discusses the need to include group- or macro-level variables in epidemiologic studies, thus incorporating multiple levels of determination in the study of health outcomes. These types of analyses, which have been called contextual or multi-level analyses, challenge epidemiologists to develop theoretical models of disease causation that extend across levels and explain how group-level and individual-level variables interact in shaping health and disease. They also raise a series of methodological issues, including the need to select the appropriate contextual unit and contextual variables, to correctly specify the individual-level model, and, in some cases, to account for residual correlation between individuals within contexts. Despite its complexities, multilevel analysis holds potential for reemphasizing the role of macro-level variables in shaping health and disease in populations.
即认为人群中健康与疾病的分布完全可以依据个体特征来解释。本文讨论了在流行病学研究中纳入群体或宏观层面变量的必要性,从而在健康结果研究中纳入多个决定层面。这类分析,即所谓的情境分析或多层次分析,促使流行病学家去开发跨越不同层面的疾病因果关系理论模型,并解释群体层面和个体层面变量在塑造健康与疾病过程中是如何相互作用的。它们还引发了一系列方法学问题,包括需要选择合适的情境单位和情境变量、正确设定个体层面模型,以及在某些情况下考虑情境中个体之间的残差相关性。尽管存在复杂性,但多层次分析在重新强调宏观层面变量在塑造人群健康与疾病方面的作用方面具有潜力。