Balogun J A, Biasci S, Han L
State University of New York Health Science Center, Program in Physical Therapy, Brooklyn 11203-2098, USA.
Disabil Rehabil. 1998 Feb;20(2):41-8. doi: 10.3109/09638289809166052.
For decades, acupuncture and electroneedling treatments have been used, predominately in the Eastern countries, in the management of patients with compromised cardiovascular and digestive functions. Similarly, neuromuscular electrical stimulation is commonly employed in Western countries to modulate pain, augment muscle strength and enhance blood flow in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Many rehabilitation specialists believe that electrical stimulation of acupuncture points with surface electrodes can elicit the same physiological and therapeutic effects as those produced by acupuncture and electroneedling techniques. Electrical stimulation of acupuncture points with surface electrodes is a relatively new and non-invasive treatment with potential clinical application in the management of patients with peripheral vascular disease. Presently, there are controversies in the literature as to the effects of traditional acupuncture, electroneedling and neuromuscular electrical stimulation treatments on peripheral haemodynamic functioning. This paper provides a detailed review of published studies on the above promising therapies. An attempt was made to clarify the pitfalls in the extant literature and delineate the fact from the fiction. Areas for further research were proposed.
几十年来,针灸和电针疗法主要在东方国家用于治疗心血管和消化功能受损的患者。同样,在西方国家,神经肌肉电刺激常用于调节疼痛、增强肌肉力量以及改善外周血管疾病患者的血流。许多康复专家认为,使用表面电极对穴位进行电刺激可产生与针灸和电针技术相同的生理和治疗效果。使用表面电极对穴位进行电刺激是一种相对新颖的非侵入性治疗方法,在治疗外周血管疾病患者方面具有潜在的临床应用价值。目前,关于传统针灸、电针和神经肌肉电刺激疗法对外周血流动力学功能的影响,文献中存在争议。本文对已发表的关于上述有前景疗法的研究进行了详细综述。试图阐明现有文献中的缺陷,并区分事实与虚构内容。还提出了进一步研究的领域。