Selander J, Marnetoft S U, Bergroth A, Ekholm J
Department of Surgical Sciences, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Disabil Rehabil. 1998 Feb;20(2):49-54. doi: 10.3109/09638289809166053.
The aim of the present pretest-posttest study was to examine and compare the impact of vocational rehabilitation on future sick-leave for employed and unemployed people, respectively, on long-term sick-leave. The study is based on 416 registered long-term sick-leave cases that were initiated during 1992-94 in the city of Stockholm, and that became objects for vocational rehabilitation. The hypotheses were (1) that the number of sick-days and levels of benefit for both employed and unemployed would be less after rehabilitation than before and (2) that rehabilitation would affect employed people more than unemployed people. The hypotheses are supported in that both employed and unemployed have less sick-days and lower levels of benefits after vocational rehabilitation than before and that unemployed people have more sick-days and higher levels of benefits than employed people after rehabilitation. However, since unemployed people also have more sick-days before rehabilitation, the proportional decrease is about the same. Another finding was that men, especially among the unemployed improved more than women.
本项前后测研究的目的是分别考察和比较职业康复对在职人员和失业人员未来病假时长及长期病假的影响。该研究基于1992年至1994年期间在斯德哥尔摩市登记的416例长期病假案例,这些案例均成为职业康复的对象。研究假设为:(1)康复后,在职人员和失业人员的病假天数及福利水平均会低于康复前;(2)职业康复对在职人员的影响大于失业人员。研究假设得到了支持,因为在职人员和失业人员在职业康复后的病假天数均减少,福利水平均降低,且康复后失业人员的病假天数多于在职人员,福利水平也高于在职人员。然而,由于失业人员在康复前的病假天数也更多,所以比例下降幅度大致相同。另一个发现是,男性,尤其是失业男性的改善程度高于女性。