Zweifler J, Rodnick J
Fam Med. 1998 Feb;30(2):127-33.
Medical education has been buffeted by the frenetic changes in our health care delivery system. This commentary focuses on six major issues facing family practice training programs caring for underserved populations in California: 1) The patient base for training programs is eroding. 2) There is no or limited funding for graduate medical education (GME) in Medicaid managed care programs. 3) There are barriers to using residents in managed care systems. 4) Disproportionate share funding from Medicaid for hospitals caring for poor and underserved patients does not support medical education. 5) Capitated Medicare and Medicaid programs are siphoning off dollars meant for GME. 6) Consolidation in the health care market is threatening medical education training sites. To address these issues, primary care GME programs should work with community-based sites so both can increase patient care, educational activities, and revenue in this managed care era. At the same time, community-based training sites in primary care GME programs must redesign their delivery systems to provide efficient, cost-effective care. The result will be better access for primary care patients and more appropriate training for our residents. Family medicine educators should become increasingly involved at the local, state, and national levels to ensure that GME funding directly supports training and is not relegated to being a by-product of patient care.
医学教育已受到我们医疗服务体系中疯狂变革的冲击。本评论聚焦于加利福尼亚州为服务不足人群提供医疗服务的家庭医学培训项目所面临的六个主要问题:1)培训项目的患者群体正在减少。2)医疗补助管理式医疗项目中研究生医学教育(GME)的资金没有或非常有限。3)在管理式医疗系统中使用住院医师存在障碍。4)医疗补助为照顾贫困和服务不足患者的医院提供的比例不均衡份额资金并不支持医学教育。5)按人头计费的医疗保险和医疗补助项目正在抽走本应用于研究生医学教育的资金。6)医疗保健市场的整合正在威胁医学教育培训场所。为解决这些问题,初级保健研究生医学教育项目应与社区场所合作,以便在这个管理式医疗时代双方都能增加患者护理、教育活动和收入。与此同时,初级保健研究生医学教育项目中的社区培训场所必须重新设计其服务体系,以提供高效、具有成本效益的护理。结果将是初级保健患者能获得更好的医疗服务,我们的住院医师能得到更合适的培训。家庭医学教育工作者应在地方、州和国家层面更多地参与进来,以确保研究生医学教育资金直接支持培训,而不是沦为患者护理的副产品。