Laparoscopic versus traditional fundoplication in the treatment of children with refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: A retrospective study has been carried out on the last 20 consecutive patients operated for gastro-oesophageal reflux to compare the results of the traditional operation with those using the laparoscopic approach.

METHODS

In ten cases, the operation was performed with an open traditional approach and in the other 10 cases using laparoscopy. The mean age of the patients was 7 years and their mean weight was 20 kg. There were 11 girls and 9 boys. We used a 360 degrees Nissen fundoplication in the patients operated on via laparotomy and a Nissen-Rossetti fundoplication in patients operated on via laparoscopy.

RESULTS

Mean operating time was 65 minutes for traditional surgery and 100 minutes for laparoscopy. There were two complications: 1 case of oesophageal perforation in a child affected by endo-brachyoesophagus with peri-oesophagitis, operated using the laparoscopic technique, and one case of wound infection in a child operated with the open technique. The hospital stay was remarkably shorter and less painful for the children operated on laparoscopically. At 13-month mean follow-up, all 20 patients are alive and present no reflux symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that laparoscopic surgery is a valid alternative to the traditional surgical approach for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux.