Capes D F, Asiimwe D
School of Pharmacy, Curtin University of Technology, Bentley, Australia.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1998 Feb 15;55(4):351-9. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/55.4.351.
The flow rate accuracy and flow continuity of the Homepump, Infusor, Intermate, Paragon, Sidekick, and Springfusor 10 flow-restricting infusion devices were studied. Three of each device were tested in a temperature-controlled cabinet at the manufacturer-specified operating temperature and at 20 and 30 degrees C. The flow rates used were 100 ml/hr and the rate that would provide a 24-hour delivery of fluid, except in the case of the Springfusor 10, which was tested at the maximum and minimum flow rates. Flow rate was measured gravimetrically at 30-second intervals. The endopoint of infusion was defined as the start of the terminal-phase decline. The effect of refrigerated storage was studied by using the Intermate as an example of the elastomeric devices tested. All devices exhibited a variable flow profile during infusion except for the Paragon, which had a near-constant flow throughout. The average error in flow rate was within the manufacturer's specifications when the devices were used under the manufacturer-specified operating conditions for all devices except for the Sidekick. The definition of the endopoint made little difference in the flow rate results for the Infusor and Springfusor 10 but significantly affected the flow rate results for the other devices, for which there was a substantial terminal phase with a prolonged period of reduced flow rate. The mean flow rate, error, and coefficient of variation for the Intermate devices stored under refrigeration were significantly different from those for the devices not refrigerated before use. When operated as recommended by the manufacturer, five of six devices had a flow rate error within the manufacturer's specifications; the results were affected by endpoint definition.
对Homepump、Infusor、Intermate、Paragon、Sidekick和Springfusor 10流量限制输液装置的流速准确性和流量连续性进行了研究。每种装置各取三个,在温度可控的柜子中,于制造商规定的工作温度以及20摄氏度和30摄氏度下进行测试。除Springfusor 10在最大和最小流速下进行测试外,其他装置使用的流速为100毫升/小时以及能实现24小时液体输注的流速。每隔30秒以重量法测量流速。输液终点定义为终末相下降的开始。以Intermate作为所测试的弹性体装置的示例,研究了冷藏储存的影响。除Paragon在整个输液过程中流速近乎恒定外,所有装置在输液过程中均呈现出可变的流速曲线。当这些装置在制造商规定的工作条件下使用时,除Sidekick外,所有装置的流速平均误差均在制造商规定的规格范围内。终点的定义对Infusor和Springfusor 10的流速结果影响不大,但对其他装置的流速结果有显著影响,这些装置存在一个较长的终末相,流速降低的时间较长。冷藏储存的Intermate装置的平均流速、误差和变异系数与使用前未冷藏的装置显著不同。按照制造商的建议操作时,六种装置中有五种的流速误差在制造商规定的规格范围内;结果受终点定义的影响。