O'Connor B P, Dyce J A
Department of Psychology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1998 Feb;107(1):3-16. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.107.1.3.
In this study, the authors examined the degrees to which various models of personality disorder (PD) configuration are consistent with the primary data sets from clinical and community samples reported in the recent literature. Factor analyses were conducted on PD intercorrelation matrices, and the loading matrices were rotated to maximum possible fit with target matrices representing the PD configuration models. There was little support for the interpersonal circle or other circular orderings of PDs, or for T. Millon's (1990, 1996) biosocial learning theory. There was moderate support for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed., DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) dimensions, for C. R. Cloninger's (1987) tridimensional theory, and for S. Torgersen and R. Alnaes's (1989) decision tree. There was consistent, stronger support for the 5-factor model (T. A. Widiger, T. J. Trull, J. F. Clarkin, C. Sanderson, & P. T. Costa, 1994) and for an empirically derived 7-factor model by C. R. Cloninger and D. M. Svrakic (1994).
在本研究中，作者考察了各种人格障碍（PD）构型模型与近期文献中报道的临床和社区样本的主要数据集的一致程度。对PD相互关联矩阵进行了因子分析，并将载荷矩阵旋转至与代表PD构型模型的目标矩阵达到最大可能的拟合度。人际圈或其他PD的循环排序，以及T. 米隆（1990年、1996年）的生物社会学习理论几乎没有得到支持。《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》（第4版，DSM-IV；美国精神病学协会，1994年）的维度、C. R. 克隆宁格（1987年）的三维理论以及S. 托尔格森和R. 阿尔内斯（1989年）的决策树得到了适度支持。五因素模型（T. A. 威迪格、T. J. 特鲁尔、J. F. 克拉克因、C. 桑德森和P. T. 科斯塔，1994年）以及C. R. 克隆宁格和D. M. 斯夫拉基克（1994年）通过实证得出的七因素模型得到了一致且更强有力的支持。
