• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

控制偏好量表。

The Control Preferences Scale.

作者信息

Degner L F, Sloan J A, Venkatesh P

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg.

出版信息

Can J Nurs Res. 1997 Fall;29(3):21-43.

PMID:9505581
Abstract

The Control Preferences Scale (CPS) was developed to measure a construct that emerged from a grounded theory of how treatment decisions are made among people with life-threatening illnesses. The control preferences construct is defined as "the degree of control an individual wants to assume when decisions are being made about medical treatment." The CPS consists of five cards that each portrays a different role in treatment decision-making using a statement and a cartoon. These roles range from the individual making the treatment decisions, through the individual making the decisions jointly with the physician, to the physician making the decisions. The CPS involves subjects in making a series of paired comparisons to provide their total preference order over the five cards. These preference orders are analyzed using unfolding theory to determine the distribution of preferences in different populations and the effect of covariates on consumer preferences. The scale has been tested in a variety of populations, ranging from the general public to highly stressed groups. The CPS has proven to be a clinically relevant, easily administered, valid, and reliable measure of preferred roles in health-care decision-making.

摘要

控制偏好量表(CPS)的开发旨在衡量一种源自扎根理论的结构,该理论阐述了危及生命疾病患者如何做出治疗决策。控制偏好结构被定义为“在做出医疗治疗决策时,个体希望承担的控制程度”。CPS由五张卡片组成,每张卡片通过一句话和一幅卡通画描绘了治疗决策中不同的角色。这些角色从做出治疗决策的个体,到与医生共同做出决策的个体,再到医生做出决策。CPS让受试者进行一系列成对比较,以提供他们对五张卡片的总体偏好顺序。使用展开理论分析这些偏好顺序,以确定不同人群中偏好的分布以及协变量对消费者偏好的影响。该量表已在从普通公众到高压力群体等各种人群中进行了测试。事实证明,CPS是一种在医疗保健决策中对偏好角色具有临床相关性、易于实施、有效且可靠的测量工具。

相似文献

1
The Control Preferences Scale.控制偏好量表。
Can J Nurs Res. 1997 Fall;29(3):21-43.
2
Exploring dental patients' preferred roles in treatment decision-making - a novel approach.探索牙科患者在治疗决策中偏好的角色——一种新方法。
Br Dent J. 2003 Mar 22;194(6):321-7; discussion 317. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809946.
3
Veterans' decision-making preferences and perceived involvement in care for chronic heart failure.退伍军人对慢性心力衰竭护理的决策偏好及感知参与度
Heart Lung. 2008 Nov-Dec;37(6):440-8. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
4
Patient participation in clinical decision-making in nursing: A comparative study of nurses' and patients' perceptions.患者参与护理临床决策:护士与患者认知的比较研究
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Dec;15(12):1498-508. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01464.x.
5
Measuring men's preferences for involvement in medical care: getting the question right.衡量男性参与医疗护理的偏好:正确提出问题。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2005 Jun;11(3):237-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00530.x.
6
Measuring the involvement of people with HIV in treatment decision making using the control preferences scale.使用控制偏好量表衡量艾滋病毒感染者参与治疗决策的情况。
Med Decis Making. 2008 Nov-Dec;28(6):899-908. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08317014. Epub 2008 Aug 29.
7
A role for the sick role. Patient preferences regarding information and participation in clinical decision-making.患病角色的作用。患者对信息及参与临床决策的偏好。
CMAJ. 1997 Aug 15;157(4):383-9.
8
Preferences for involvement in treatment decision-making generally and in hormone replacement and urinary incontinence treatment decision-making specifically.总体上对参与治疗决策的偏好,特别是在激素替代和尿失禁治疗决策方面的偏好。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Nov;68(3):243-51. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.06.009. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
9
Preferences of older and younger adults with serious mental illness for involvement in decision-making in medical and psychiatric settings.患有严重精神疾病的老年人和年轻人在医疗和精神科环境中参与决策的偏好。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Oct;16(10):826-33. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e318181f992.
10
Preferences of acutely ill patients for participation in medical decision-making.急性病患者参与医疗决策的偏好。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Apr;17(2):97-100. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.021378.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Medication Management Technologies in Swiss Primary Care: Mixed Methods Study.瑞士初级医疗中药物管理技术的应用:混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 27;27:e68857. doi: 10.2196/68857.
2
Barriers to Implementing Shared Decision-Making in Postgraduate Medical Education: The Role of Disease-Centered Beliefs.研究生医学教育中实施共同决策的障碍:以疾病为中心的信念的作用。
Perspect Med Educ. 2025 Jul 25;14(1):436-446. doi: 10.5334/pme.1465. eCollection 2025.
3
Effectiveness of a web-based decision aid for patients with Generalised Anxiety Disorder in Spain: a randomised controlled trial.
西班牙针对广泛性焦虑症患者的基于网络的决策辅助工具的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2025 Jul 8;32(1):e101185. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101185.
4
AMPDECIDE amputation level patient decision aids: a feasibility study.AMPDECIDE截肢水平患者决策辅助工具:一项可行性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03084-7.
5
Decision-Making preferences in advanced cancer patients: associations with sociodemographic and psychological factors.晚期癌症患者的决策偏好:与社会人口学和心理因素的关联
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01806-2.
6
Congruence of cancer patients' desired and achieved decision-making roles between self, doctor and family: a cross-sectional multi-site survey.癌症患者期望的与实际达成的自我、医生及家庭之间决策角色的一致性:一项多中心横断面调查
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):1120. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14510-4.
7
Medical students' attitudes toward providing patients with audio recordings of their medical encounters: a cross-sectional online survey.医学生对为患者提供医疗问诊录音的态度:一项横断面在线调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jun 19;25(1):853. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07460-9.
8
The views of women and their physicians on decision-making for stress urinary incontinence.女性及其医生对压力性尿失禁决策的看法。
World J Urol. 2025 May 26;43(1):329. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05668-4.
9
Perspectives of clinicians on shared decision making in hospice care for advanced cancer patients in Nanjing: a descriptive qualitative study.南京晚期癌症患者临终关怀中临床医生对共同决策的看法:一项描述性定性研究
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 May 22;24(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01770-x.
10
A cross-sectional online survey on oncologists' attitudes toward and experiences with providing patients with audio recordings of their medical encounters.一项关于肿瘤学家对为患者提供医疗会诊录音的态度及经历的横断面在线调查。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 16;15(1):17100. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01962-8.