Suppr超能文献

一项关于高频振荡通气与传统通气在接受表面活性剂治疗的呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿中的前瞻性、随机、多中心试验。

A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome receiving surfactant.

作者信息

Rettwitz-Volk W, Veldman A, Roth B, Vierzig A, Kachel W, Varnholt V, Schlösser R, von Loewenich V

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Frankfurt a. Main, Federal Republic of Germany.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 1998 Feb;132(2):249-54. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70440-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) and intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV) as a primary ventilation mode in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Primary end points were survival and maintenance of the randomized ventilation mode.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

Level III neonatal intensive care units at three university children's hospitals.

PATIENTS

Ninety-six premature infants (gestational age < 32 weeks) randomly assigned to HFOV or IPPV within the first 2 hours of life. All patients received a natural surfactant. No differences were found between the study groups with respect to the demographic data or the severity of respiratory distress syndrome. Infants were stratified at randomization, by birth weight, into two groups: 750 to 1000 gm (n = 32) and 1001 to 1500 gm (n = 64). The centers involved complied with a study protocol that planned a reduction in respiratory pressures when the infant's oxygen requirement had reached a fractional concentration of inspired oxygen of 0.6.

RESULTS

Five patients in the HFOV group died, and eight patients did not respond to the randomized ventilation mode; whereas four patients in the IPPV group died, and nine were switched to HFOV. No differences were found in gas exchange or ventilator support over the first 72 hours. Premature infants with a birth weight < 1000 gm had a significantly shorter course to reach fractional concentration of inspired oxygen of 0.21 while receiving IPPV than those receiving HFOV (9.3+/-4.5 days vs 27.5+/-10.2 days, p = 0.01). No differences were found between the groups in extraalveolar air (HFOV seven; IPPV, seven) and intracranial bleeding (HFOV, nine; IPPV, eight).

CONCLUSION

After surfactant treatment, HFOV, as a primary ventilation mode in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome, is as safe and efficacious as conventional ventilation.

摘要

目的

比较高频振荡通气(HFOV)和间歇正压通气(IPPV)作为呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿的初始通气模式。主要终点是存活及维持随机分配的通气模式。

研究设计

前瞻性、多中心、随机临床试验。

研究地点

三家大学儿童医院的三级新生儿重症监护病房。

患者

96例早产儿(胎龄<32周)在出生后2小时内随机分配至HFOV或IPPV组。所有患者均接受天然表面活性物质治疗。研究组间在人口统计学数据或呼吸窘迫综合征严重程度方面未发现差异。婴儿在随机分组时按出生体重分层为两组:750至1000克(n = 32)和1001至1500克(n = 64)。参与的中心遵循一项研究方案,即当婴儿的氧需求达到吸入氧分数为0.6时降低呼吸压力。

结果

HFOV组有5例患者死亡,8例患者对随机分配的通气模式无反应;而IPPV组有4例患者死亡,9例改为HFOV。在最初72小时内,气体交换或通气支持方面未发现差异。出生体重<1000克的早产儿在接受IPPV时达到吸入氧分数为0.21的疗程明显短于接受HFOV的早产儿(9.3±4.5天对27.5±10.2天,p = 0.01)。两组在肺泡外气体(HFOV组7例;IPPV组7例)和颅内出血(HFOV组9例;IPPV组8例)方面未发现差异。

结论

表面活性物质治疗后,HFOV作为呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿的初始通气模式,与传统通气一样安全有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验