Barron H V, Viskin S, Lundstrom R J, Swain B E, Truman A F, Wong C C, Selby J V
Department of Medicine and Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 1998 Mar 9;158(5):449-53. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.5.449.
Although long-term beta-blocker therapy has been found beneficial in patients after an acute myocardial infarction, these drugs are greatly underused by clinicians. Moreover, the dosages of beta-blockers used in randomized controlled trials appear to be much larger than those routinely prescribed.
To determine whether an association exists between the dosage of beta-blockers prescribed after a myocardial infarction and cardiac mortality.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of 1165 patients who survived an acute myocardial infarction from January 1, 1990, through December 31, 1992. These patients represent a subgroup of the 6851 patients hospitalized at northern California Kaiser Permanente hospitals.
Of the 37.7% of patients prescribed beta-blocker therapy, 48.1% were treated with dosages less than 50% of the dosage found to be effective in preventing cardiac death in large randomized clinical trials (lower-dosage therapy). Compared with patients not receiving beta-blockers, those treated with lower-dosage therapy appeared to have a greater reduction in cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 0.33; P=.009) than patients treated with a higher dosage (hazard ratio, 0.82; P=0.51), after adjustment for age, sex, race, disease severity, and comorbidities.
The dosages of beta-blockers shown to be effective in randomized trials are not commonly used in clinical practice, and treatment with lower dosages of beta-blockers was associated with at least as great a reduction in mortality as treatment with higher dosages. This suggests that physicians who are reluctant to prescribe beta-blockers because of the relatively large dosages used in the large prospective clinical trials should be encouraged to prescribe smaller dosages.
尽管长期β受体阻滞剂治疗已被发现对急性心肌梗死后的患者有益,但临床医生对这些药物的使用严重不足。此外,随机对照试验中使用的β受体阻滞剂剂量似乎比常规处方剂量大得多。
确定心肌梗死后开具的β受体阻滞剂剂量与心脏死亡率之间是否存在关联。
我们对1990年1月1日至1992年12月31日期间急性心肌梗死存活的1165例患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。这些患者是北加利福尼亚凯撒医疗集团医院住院的6851例患者的一个亚组。
在接受β受体阻滞剂治疗的37.7%的患者中,48.1%接受的剂量低于大型随机临床试验中发现的预防心脏死亡有效剂量的50%(低剂量治疗)。在调整年龄、性别、种族、疾病严重程度和合并症后,与未接受β受体阻滞剂治疗的患者相比,接受低剂量治疗的患者心血管死亡率降低幅度似乎大于接受高剂量治疗的患者(风险比,0.33;P=0.009),而接受高剂量治疗的患者风险比为0.82;P=0.51)。
随机试验中显示有效的β受体阻滞剂剂量在临床实践中并不常用,低剂量β受体阻滞剂治疗与高剂量治疗至少在降低死亡率方面效果相当。这表明,那些因大型前瞻性临床试验中使用的剂量相对较大而不愿开具β受体阻滞剂的医生应被鼓励开具较小剂量的药物。