Groen J, Van Dijk G, Niesters H G, Van Der Meijden W I, Osterhaus A D
Institute of Virology, University Hospital Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Mar;36(3):845-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.3.845-847.1998.
The sensitivities and specificities of three immunoassays for the detection of herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2)-specific immunoglobulin G antibodies in serum, including the one-strip rapid immunoblot assay (RIBA; Chiron Corporation) and two indirect enzyme immunosorbent assays (EIA; Gull Laboratories and Centocor), were compared by testing a panel of 1,250 serum samples from individuals attending an outpatient clinic for sexually transmitted diseases. A qualitative agreement among the three assays was observed with 1,080 serum samples (86.4%); 291 of the serum samples (23.3%) were positive, 789 samples (63.1%) were negative, and 170 serum samples (13.6%) gave a discordant result. Results were considered conclusive when a concordant result was obtained with two of three assays. The sensitivities and specificities of the RIBA, the Gull EIA, and the Centocor EIA proved to be 99.2, 99.7, and 89.9% and 97.1, 96.7, and 99.3%, respectively. These results indicate that the Chiron RIBA and the Gull EIA are especially useful and reliable for the detection of HSV-2-specific antibodies in serum.
通过检测一组来自性病门诊患者的1250份血清样本,比较了三种免疫测定法检测血清中2型单纯疱疹病毒(HSV - 2)特异性免疫球蛋白G抗体的敏感性和特异性,这三种方法包括单条快速免疫印迹法(RIBA;Chiron公司)和两种间接酶免疫吸附测定法(EIA;Gull实验室和Centocor公司)。在1080份血清样本(86.4%)中观察到三种测定法之间存在定性一致性;291份血清样本(23.3%)呈阳性,789份样本(63.1%)呈阴性,170份血清样本(13.6%)给出了不一致的结果。当三种测定法中的两种获得一致结果时,结果被认为是确定的。RIBA、Gull EIA和Centocor EIA的敏感性和特异性分别为99.2%、99.7%和89.9%以及97.1%、96.7%和99.3%。这些结果表明,Chiron RIBA和Gull EIA对于检测血清中的HSV - 2特异性抗体特别有用且可靠。