Romminger K, Hoppe H
Nahrung. 1976;20(4):407-17. doi: 10.1002/food.19760200413.
With regard to routine analyses in market control, the authors recommend two methods (according to the expected amounts of active principle) for the determination of thiabendazole residues on citrus fruits and bananas. The ultraviolet spectrophotometric method is preferable in determining thiabendazole contents of more than 1 p.p.m., if the cleaning operations described are respected. For the detection of thiabendazole and for the determination of amounts of less than 1 p.p.m. (the tolerance limit being 0.2 p.p.m. for pomes, berries, stone fruits, kernel fruits and also for potatoes) the thin-layer chromatographic method seems likewise to be suited (also in considering that it is semi-quantitative by nature); especially since the spectrophotometric method yields values by 0.2 p.p.m. too high (due to the measurement of residual absorption of vegetable constituents). The authors are of opinion that such an error must be considered to be too high for contents lower than 1 p.p.m.
关于市场监管中的常规分析，作者推荐了两种方法（根据有效成分的预期含量）来测定柑橘类水果和香蕉中的噻菌灵残留量。如果遵循所述的清洁操作，紫外分光光度法在测定噻菌灵含量超过百万分之一时更可取。对于噻菌灵的检测以及含量低于百万分之一（梨果、浆果、核果、仁果以及土豆的耐受限度为百万分之0.2）的测定，薄层色谱法似乎同样适用（同样考虑到其本质上是半定量的）；特别是因为分光光度法得出的值比实际值高百万分之0.2（由于对植物成分残留吸收的测量）。作者认为，对于低于百万分之一的含量，这样的误差过高。
