• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Randomized, double-blind study of ciprofloxacin and cefuroxime axetil for treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The Bronchitis Study Group.

作者信息

Chodosh S, McCarty J, Farkas S, Drehobl M, Tosiello R, Shan M, Aneiro L, Kowalsky S

机构信息

Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 1998 Oct;27(4):722-9. doi: 10.1086/514930.

DOI:10.1086/514930
PMID:9798024
Abstract

In a prospective, multicenter, double-blind study, the interval to clinical relapse in patients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis from whom a pretherapy pathogen was isolated was compared following treatment with ciprofloxacin or cefuroxime axetil. Clinical and microbiological responses at the end of therapy were secondary efficacy variables. Outpatients randomly received either ciprofloxacin or cefuroxime axetil (500 mg twice a day for 14 days). Three hundred seven patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis were enrolled, of whom 208 had an exacerbation due to a bacterial pathogen. Clinical resolution at the end of ciprofloxacin and cefuroxime axetil therapy for patients for whom efficacy could be evaluated was 93% and 90%, respectively. Bacteriologic eradication rates were statistically higher for ciprofloxacin recipients (96% [89 of 93]) than for cefuroxime axetil recipients (82% [80 of 97]) (P < .01). The median infection-free interval was 146 days for ciprofloxacin recipients vs. 178 days for cefuroxime axetil recipients (P = .37). In conclusion, ciprofloxacin was associated with an infection-free interval and clinical response that were similar to those associated with cefuroxime axetil, but the bacteriologic eradication rate associated with ciprofloxacin was statistically significantly higher than that associated with cefuroxime axetil.

摘要

相似文献

1
Randomized, double-blind study of ciprofloxacin and cefuroxime axetil for treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The Bronchitis Study Group.
Clin Infect Dis. 1998 Oct;27(4):722-9. doi: 10.1086/514930.
2
Ciprofloxacin versus cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of adult patients with acute bacterial sinusitis.环丙沙星与头孢呋辛酯治疗成人急性细菌性鼻窦炎的疗效比较
J Otolaryngol. 1998 Feb;27(1):10-6.
3
Efficacy of oral ciprofloxacin vs. clarithromycin for treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The Bronchitis Study Group.口服环丙沙星与克拉霉素治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染的疗效。支气管炎研究组。
Clin Infect Dis. 1998 Oct;27(4):730-8. doi: 10.1086/514934.
4
Ciprofloxacin versus cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis. Sinusitis Infection Study Group.环丙沙星与头孢呋辛酯治疗急性细菌性鼻窦炎的对比研究。鼻窦炎感染研究组。
J Otolaryngol. 1999 Feb;28(1):3-12.
5
Effectiveness of short-course therapy (5 days) with cefuroxime axetil in treatment of secondary bacterial infections of acute bronchitis.头孢呋辛酯短程疗法(5天)治疗急性支气管炎继发细菌感染的疗效
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995 Nov;39(11):2528-34. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.11.2528.
6
Levofloxacin versus cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis: results of a randomized, double-blind study.左氧氟沙星与头孢呋辛酯治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的随机双盲研究结果
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Apr;43(4):529-39. doi: 10.1093/jac/43.4.529.
7
Clinical comparison of cefuroxime axetil and amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of patients with secondary bacterial infections of acute bronchitis.头孢呋辛酯与阿莫西林/克拉维酸治疗急性支气管炎继发细菌感染患者的临床比较
Clin Ther. 1995 Sep-Oct;17(5):861-74. doi: 10.1016/0149-2918(95)80064-6.
8
Bacteriological eradication of Streptococcus pneumoniae from patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: cefuroxime axetil versus cefixime.慢性支气管炎急性加重患者肺炎链球菌的细菌学清除:头孢呋辛酯与头孢克肟对比
Int J Clin Pract. 1999 Sep;53(6):437-43.
9
Comparison of moxifloxacin and cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis. Sinusitis Infection Study Group.
Clin Ther. 1999 Oct;21(10):1664-77. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(99)80046-0.
10
A multicenter, randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of intravenous and/or oral levofloxacin versus ceftriaxone and/or cefuroxime axetil in treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia.一项多中心随机研究,比较静脉注射和/或口服左氧氟沙星与头孢曲松和/或头孢呋辛酯治疗成人社区获得性肺炎的疗效和安全性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997 Sep;41(9):1965-72. doi: 10.1128/AAC.41.9.1965.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Benefit of Appropriate Empirical Fluoroquinolone Therapy for Adults with Community-Onset Bacteremia in Comparison with Third-Generation-Cephalosporin Therapy.与第三代头孢菌素治疗相比,适当的经验性氟喹诺酮治疗对社区获得性菌血症成人患者的临床益处。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Jan 24;61(2). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02174-16. Print 2017 Feb.
2
New semiphysiological absorption model to assess the pharmacodynamic profile of cefuroxime axetil using nonparametric and parametric population pharmacokinetics.使用非参数和参数群体药代动力学评估头孢呋辛酯药效学特征的新半生理吸收模型。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Aug;53(8):3462-71. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00054-09. Epub 2009 Jun 15.
3
Role of macrolide therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
大环内酯类药物治疗在慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的作用。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2008;3(3):331-50. doi: 10.2147/copd.s681.
4
Antimicrobials in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - An analysis of the time to next exacerbation before and after the implementation of standing orders.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期的抗菌药物——对医嘱执行前后至下次加重期时间的分析
Can J Infect Dis. 2003 Sep;14(5):254-9. doi: 10.1155/2003/392617.
5
Oral fluoroquinolones in the treatment of pneumonia, bronchitis and sinusitis.口服氟喹诺酮类药物治疗肺炎、支气管炎和鼻窦炎。
Can J Infect Dis. 2002 Sep;13(5):293-300. doi: 10.1155/2002/698146.
6
Should patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis be treated with antibiotics? Advantages of the use of fluoroquinolones.慢性支气管炎急性加重期的患者应该用抗生素治疗吗?使用氟喹诺酮类药物的优势。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006 May;12 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):42-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01396.x.
7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in geriatric critical care.老年危重症中的慢性阻塞性肺疾病
Crit Care Clin. 2003 Oct;19(4):713-27. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0704(03)00054-x.
8
Cefuroxime axetil: an updated review of its use in the management of bacterial infections.头孢呋辛酯:关于其在细菌感染治疗中应用的最新综述
Drugs. 2001;61(10):1455-500. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200161100-00008.
9
Bacterial infection in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 2000: a state-of-the-art review.2000年慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的细菌感染:最新综述
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001 Apr;14(2):336-63. doi: 10.1128/CMR.14.2.336-363.2001.
10
Acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: what role for the new fluoroquinolones?慢性支气管炎急性加重:新型氟喹诺酮类药物有何作用?
Drugs Aging. 2001;18(1):1-11. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200118010-00001.