• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[丙泊酚与七氟醚——喉显微手术麻醉的比较]

[Propofol and sevoflurane--a comparison of anesthesia for laryngomicrosurgery].

作者信息

Nishimori M, Takasaki M, Akune T, Hanaoka K

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Tokyo Senbai Hospital.

出版信息

Masui. 1998 Feb;47(2):168-73.

PMID:9513329
Abstract

Laryngomicrosurgery has some special characteristics. It is under much stress such as intubation and direct laryngoscopy during a short operation time. Therefore both adequate anesthesia and quick recovery are needed. Thirty three ASA physical status I patients for laryngomicrosurgery were randomly assigned to receive either anesthesia with propofol and small dose of fentanyl (Group P) or anesthesia with thiopental and sevoflurane (Group S). Group P was induced with propofol 2-3 mg.kg-1 and fentanyl 0.1 mg and maintained with propofol 6 mg.kg-1.h-1 (from 10 mg.kg-1.h-1 by 2 mg.kg-1.h-1 decrement in interval of 10 minutes). No intravenous analgesic was added. Group S was induced with thiopental 4 -5 mg.kg-1 and maintained with sevoflurane 2-3%. We compared emergence time and the state of recovery 5 minutes after extubation and 5 minutes after entering the recovery room. There was no episode of inadequate anesthetic state in both groups. The emergence time was significantly shorter in Group P than in Group S. The state of recovery was much better in Group P compared with Group S in both 5 minutes after extubation and 5 minutes after entering the recovery room. Therefore, anesthesia with propofol and small dose of fentanyl at induction is more adequate compared with anesthesia with sevoflurane in laryngomicrosurgery.

摘要

支撑喉镜显微手术有一些特殊的特点。在短时间手术过程中,它面临诸如插管和直接喉镜检查等诸多压力。因此,既需要充分的麻醉,又需要快速恢复。33例拟行支撑喉镜显微手术的ASAⅠ级患者被随机分为两组,分别接受丙泊酚复合小剂量芬太尼麻醉(P组)或硫喷妥钠复合七氟醚麻醉(S组)。P组诱导时静脉注射丙泊酚2~3mg·kg-1和芬太尼0.1mg,维持用丙泊酚6mg·kg-1·h-1(从10mg·kg-1·h-1开始,每隔10分钟递减2mg·kg-1·h-1),不追加静脉镇痛药物。S组诱导时静脉注射硫喷妥钠4~5mg·kg-1,维持用2%~3%的七氟醚。比较两组患者的苏醒时间、拔管后5分钟及进入恢复室后5分钟的恢复情况。两组均未出现麻醉效果不佳的情况。P组的苏醒时间明显短于S组。在拔管后5分钟及进入恢复室后5分钟,P组的恢复情况均明显好于S组。因此,在支撑喉镜显微手术中,诱导时采用丙泊酚复合小剂量芬太尼麻醉比七氟醚麻醉更合适。

相似文献

1
[Propofol and sevoflurane--a comparison of anesthesia for laryngomicrosurgery].[丙泊酚与七氟醚——喉显微手术麻醉的比较]
Masui. 1998 Feb;47(2):168-73.
2
Comparison of total intravenous anesthesia and sevoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia for outpatient otorhinolaryngeal surgery.全凭静脉麻醉与七氟醚-芬太尼麻醉用于门诊耳鼻喉科手术的比较。
J Clin Anesth. 2002 Aug;14(5):324-8. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(02)00367-7.
3
[Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol is advantageous than thiopental-sevoflurane anesthesia in the recovery phase].在恢复期,丙泊酚全静脉麻醉比硫喷妥钠-七氟醚麻醉更具优势。
Masui. 1998 Sep;47(9):1046-58.
4
Propofol and sevoflurane during epidural/general anesthesia: comparison of early recovery characteristics and pain relief.硬膜外/全身麻醉期间丙泊酚与七氟醚的比较:早期恢复特征及疼痛缓解情况
Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2004 Jun;17(5):819-32.
5
No difference in emergence time and early cognitive function between sevoflurane-fentanyl and propofol-remifentanil in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial intracranial surgery.幕上颅内手术开颅患者中,七氟醚-芬太尼与丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼在苏醒时间和早期认知功能方面无差异。
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2005 Jul;17(3):134-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ana.0000167447.33969.16.
6
A comparison: the efficacy of sevoflurane-nitrous oxide or propofol-nitrous oxide for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia.一项比较:七氟醚-氧化亚氮或丙泊酚-氧化亚氮用于全身麻醉诱导和维持的疗效。
J Clin Anesth. 1996 Dec;8(8):639-43. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(96)00172-9.
7
Fast-track anesthesia in patients undergoing outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: comparison of sevoflurane with total intravenous anesthesia.在接受门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者中进行快速通道麻醉:七氟醚与全静脉麻醉的比较。
J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb;37:25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.10.036. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
8
[Comparison of sevoflurane and propofol in the maintenance of and recovery from anesthesia].七氟醚与丙泊酚在麻醉维持与苏醒中的比较
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1999 Dec;46(10):427-32.
9
Sevoflurane provides better recovery than propofol plus fentanyl in anaesthesia for day-care surgery.在日间手术麻醉中,七氟醚比丙泊酚加芬太尼能带来更好的恢复效果。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2000 Feb;17(2):138-43. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.2000.00626.x.
10
Sevoflurane-maintained anesthesia induced with propofol or sevoflurane in small children: induction and recovery characteristics.丙泊酚或七氟醚诱导用于小儿七氟醚维持麻醉:诱导和恢复特征
Can J Anaesth. 1999 Jan;46(1):21-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03012509.

引用本文的文献

1
Recovery profile of patients undergoing nasal surgical procedures: a comparison between sevoflurane and propofol.接受鼻部手术患者的恢复情况:七氟醚与丙泊酚的比较
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Jun;60(2):123-7. doi: 10.1007/s12070-008-0054-5. Epub 2008 Jul 23.