Ageel A M, Chin L, Trafton C L, Jones B C, Picchioni A L
Psychopharmacologia. 1976 Apr 15;46(3):311-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00421120.
Morphine sulfate, 0.25-24.0 mg/kg, or chlorpromazine hydrochloride, 0.0625-4.0mg/kg were administered subcutaneously to naive rats 30 min prior to the start of massed-trials conditioned avoidance response (CAR) testing. The graded doses of both drugs were applied in each of three CAR task difficulty levels created by manipulation of the duration of conditioned and unconditioned stimuli, intertrial interval and shock intensity. Chlorpromazine, in a dose-related manner, caused a decrement in CAR acquisition in all tasks. Morphine, in comparison, produced a biphasic dose response. For a given task difficulty, low doses of morphine enhanced acquisition, whereas higher doses inhibited acquisition. With increasing task difficulty, relatively larger doses of morphine were required to inhibit or facilitate acquisition of CAR. These results emphasize the need to consider not only drug dosage levels, but also the interaction of task difficulty in the application of drugs in learning paradigms.
在密集试验条件性回避反应(CAR)测试开始前30分钟,给未经处理的大鼠皮下注射0.25 - 24.0毫克/千克的硫酸吗啡或0.0625 - 4.0毫克/千克的盐酸氯丙嗪。通过操纵条件刺激和非条件刺激的持续时间、试验间隔和电击强度,在三种CAR任务难度水平的每一种中应用这两种药物的分级剂量。氯丙嗪以剂量相关的方式导致所有任务中CAR获得量减少。相比之下,吗啡产生双相剂量反应。对于给定的任务难度,低剂量吗啡增强获得量,而高剂量则抑制获得量。随着任务难度增加,需要相对更大剂量的吗啡来抑制或促进CAR的获得。这些结果强调在学习范式中应用药物时,不仅要考虑药物剂量水平,还要考虑任务难度的相互作用。