Eakin E G, Resnikoff P M, Prewitt L M, Ries A L, Kaplan R M
Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, University of California San Diego/San Diego State University, USA.
Chest. 1998 Mar;113(3):619-24. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.3.619.
Evaluate the reliability and validity of a new version of the University of California, San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (SOBQ), a 24-item measure that assesses self-reported shortness of breath while performing a variety of activities of daily living.
PATIENTS enrolled in a pulmonary rehabilitation program were asked to complete the SOBQ, the Quality of Well-Being Scale, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, and a 6-min walk with modified Borg scale ratings of perceived breathlessness following the walk.
University medical center pulmonary rehabilitation program.
Thirty-two male subjects and 22 female subjects with a variety of pulmonary diagnoses: COPD (n=28), cystic fibrosis (n=9), and postlung transplant (n=17).
The current version of the SOBQ was compared with the previous version, the format of which often resulted in a significant number of "not applicable" answers. The results demonstrated that the SOBQ had excellent internal consistency (alpha=0.96). The SOBQ was also significantly correlated with all validity criteria.
The SOBQ is a valuable assessment tool in both clinical practice and research in patients with moderate-to-severe lung disease.
评估新版加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥分校呼吸急促问卷(SOBQ)的信度和效度,这是一项包含24个条目的测评工具,用于评估在进行各种日常生活活动时自我报告的呼吸急促情况。
要求参加肺康复计划的患者完成SOBQ、幸福感量表、流行病学研究中心抑郁量表,并在6分钟步行后使用改良的博格量表对主观呼吸急促程度进行评分。
大学医学中心肺康复计划。
32名男性受试者和22名女性受试者,患有多种肺部疾病:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD,n = 28)、囊性纤维化(n = 9)和肺移植后(n = 17)。
将当前版本的SOBQ与先前版本进行比较,先前版本的格式常常导致大量“不适用”答案。结果表明,SOBQ具有出色的内部一致性(α = 0.96)。SOBQ与所有效度标准也显著相关。
SOBQ在中重度肺部疾病患者的临床实践和研究中都是一种有价值的评估工具。