McCrory M A, Molé P A, Gomez T D, Dewey K G, Bernauer E M
Departments of Nutrition and Exercise Science, University of California, Davis, California 95616-8669, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998 Apr;84(4):1475-9. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1998.84.4.1475.
The BOD POD, a new air-displacement plethysmograph for measuring human body composition, utilizes the inverse relationship between pressure and volume (Boyle's law) to measure body volume directly. The quantity of air in the lungs during tidal breathing, the average thoracic gas volume (Vtg), is also measured by the BOD POD by using a standard plethysmographic technique. Alternatively, the BOD POD provides the use of a predicted Vtg (Vtgpred). The validity of using Vtgpred in place of measured Vtg (Vtgmeas) to determine the percentage of body fat (%BF) was evaluated in 50 subjects (36 women, 14 men; ages 18-56 yr). There was no significant difference between Vtgmeas and Vtgpred (mean difference +/- SE, 53.5 +/- 63.3 ml) nor in %BF by using Vtgmeas vs. Vtgpred (0.2 +/- 0.2 %BF). On an individual basis, %BF measured by using Vtgmeas vs. Vtgpred differed within +/-2.0% BF for 82% of the subjects; maximum differences were -2.9 to +3.0% BF. For comparison, data from 24 subjects who had undergone hydrostatic weighing were evaluated for the validity of using predicted vs. measured residual lung volume (VRpred vs. VRmeas, respectively). Differences between VRmeas and VRpred and in %BF calculated by using VRmeas vs. VRpred were significant (187 +/- 46 ml and 1.4 +/- 0.3% BF, respectively; P < 0.001). On an individual basis, %BF determined by using VRmeas vs. VRpred differed within +/-2.0% BF for 46% of the subjects; maximum differences were -2.9 to +3.8% BF. With respect to %BF measured by air displacement, our findings support the use of Vtgpred for group mean comparisons and for purposes such as screening in young to middle-aged individuals. This contrasts with the use of VRpred in hydrostatic weighing, which leads to significant errors in the estimation of %BF. Furthermore, although the use of Vtgpred has some application, determining Vtgmeas is relatively simple in most cases. Therefore, we recommend that the use of Vtgmeas remain as standard experimental and clinical practice.
BOD POD是一种用于测量人体成分的新型空气置换体积描记仪,它利用压力与体积的反比关系(波义耳定律)直接测量人体体积。通过标准体积描记技术,BOD POD还可测量潮气呼吸时肺内的空气量,即平均胸腔气体体积(Vtg)。另外,BOD POD也可使用预测的Vtg(Vtgpred)。在50名受试者(36名女性,14名男性;年龄18 - 56岁)中评估了使用Vtgpred代替测量的Vtg(Vtgmeas)来确定体脂百分比(%BF)的有效性。Vtgmeas与Vtgpred之间无显著差异(平均差值±标准误,53.5±63.3 ml),使用Vtgmeas与Vtgpred得出的%BF也无显著差异(0.2±0.2 %BF)。就个体而言,82%的受试者使用Vtgmeas与Vtgpred测量的%BF差异在±2.0% BF以内;最大差异为 - 2.9至 + 3.0% BF。作为比较,对24名接受过水下称重的受试者的数据进行评估,以确定使用预测的与测量的残气量(分别为VRpred与VRmeas)的有效性。VRmeas与VRpred之间以及使用VRmeas与VRpred计算的%BF之间存在显著差异(分别为187±46 ml和1.4±0.3% BF;P < 0.001)。就个体而言,46%的受试者使用VRmeas与VRpred确定的%BF差异在±2.0% BF以内;最大差异为 - 2.9至 + 3.8% BF。关于通过空气置换测量的%BF,我们的研究结果支持使用Vtgpred进行组均值比较以及用于年轻至中年个体的筛查等目的。这与水下称重中使用VRpred形成对比,后者在%BF估计中会导致显著误差。此外,尽管使用Vtgpred有一定应用,但在大多数情况下确定Vtgmeas相对简单。因此,我们建议将使用Vtgmeas作为标准的实验和临床实践。