Dybkaer R
Copenhagen Hospital Corporation, Department of Standardization in Laboratory Medicine, H:S Kommunehospitalet, Denmark.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1998 Feb;58(1):35-45. doi: 10.1080/00365519850186814.
The consistent description and treatment of metrological data in laboratory medicine are hampered by the lack of a systematic, universally accepted nomenclature and by variations in the conceptual understanding of uncertainty. The differences between the classical approach to a result as consisting of a true value plus errors and the new approach of a measured corrected value with uncertainty based on a detailed uncertainty budget are discussed. The various definitions of some relevant concepts, including "accuracy", the new concept "trueness", and "precision", are contrasted, and proposed modification are presented.
实验室医学中计量数据的一致描述和处理受到缺乏系统的、普遍接受的命名法以及对不确定性概念理解差异的阻碍。文中讨论了将结果视为由真值加误差组成的经典方法与基于详细不确定度预算的带有不确定度的测量修正值的新方法之间的差异。对比了包括“准确度”、新概念“真实性”和“精密度”等一些相关概念的各种定义,并提出了修改建议。