• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Is asthma self-management cost-effective?

作者信息

Liljas B, Lahdensuo A

机构信息

Astra Draco AB, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 1997 Dec;32(1 Suppl):S97-104. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(97)00101-8.

DOI:10.1016/s0738-3991(97)00101-8
PMID:9516765
Abstract

Many clinical studies have shown that self-management and educational programs in asthma are effective. However, these programs are costly themselves and could also lead to higher drug costs due to higher rates of compliance. On the other hand, if better usage of available treatment leads to better asthma control, the patients' utilization of other health care resources and absence from work might be reduced. An interesting question is therefore whether the self-management and educational programs in asthma have been cost-effective. This study holds a review of the evidence of cost-effectiveness of self-management and educational programs in asthma. Several methodological flaws were detected (for example, a common effectiveness, variable is lacking in the literature) and suggestions of improvements were given. The overall picture is, however, that self-management and educational programs in asthma are cost-effective interventions, both for children and for adults. As would be expected, it also seems as if programs directed at high risk groups and patients with severe asthma are even more cost-effective. Costs for absence from work were often excluded, which could lead to further societal savings. Also, some studies showed that the effect of the self-management and educational programs had effects even after the initial year. Since most studies only covered the initial year of treatment, the cost-effectiveness of self-management and educational programs in asthma is likely to be underestimated in the reported studies.

摘要

相似文献

1
Is asthma self-management cost-effective?
Patient Educ Couns. 1997 Dec;32(1 Suppl):S97-104. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(97)00101-8.
2
Estimated cost impacts of law to expand coverage for self-management education to children with asthma in California.加利福尼亚州扩大哮喘儿童自我管理教育覆盖范围的法律预计成本影响。
J Asthma. 2010 Jun;47(5):581-6. doi: 10.3109/02770901003753314.
3
A cost-effectiveness analysis of a peak flow-based asthma education and self-management plan in a high-cost population.针对高成本人群的基于峰流速的哮喘教育与自我管理计划的成本效益分析。
J Asthma. 2004 Aug;41(5):559-65.
4
An evaluation of approaches to asthma self-management education for adults: the AIR/Kaiser-Permanente Study.成人哮喘自我管理教育方法的评估:AIR/凯撒医疗集团研究
Health Educ Q. 1987 Fall;14(3):333-43. doi: 10.1177/109019818701400307.
5
Long-term economic evaluation of intensive patient education during the first treatment year in newly diagnosed adult asthma.新诊断成年哮喘患者第一年治疗期间强化患者教育的长期经济评估
Respir Med. 2001 Jan;95(1):56-63. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2000.0971.
6
Randomized controlled economic evaluation of asthma self-management in primary health care.初级卫生保健中哮喘自我管理的随机对照经济评估。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Oct 15;166(8):1062-72. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2105116.
7
Economic analysis of two structured treatment and teaching programs on asthma.两种哮喘结构化治疗与教学方案的经济学分析
Allergy. 1996 May;51(5):313-9.
8
A self-management program for adult asthma. Part II: Cost-benefit analysis.成人哮喘自我管理项目。第二部分:成本效益分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1995 Mar;95(3):672-6. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(95)70171-0.
9
Asthma self-management programs can reduce the need for hospital-based asthma care.哮喘自我管理项目可以减少对医院哮喘护理的需求。
Respir Care. 1995 Jan;40(1):39-43.
10
Cost-effectiveness of self-management in asthma: a systematic review of peak flow monitoring interventions.哮喘自我管理的成本效益:峰流速监测干预措施的系统评价
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006 Fall;22(4):436-42. doi: 10.1017/S026646230605135X.

引用本文的文献

1
Severe asthma patients' and physicians' perspectives of disease burden: do they match?重度哮喘患者和医生对疾病负担的看法:二者是否一致?
ERJ Open Res. 2023 May 30;9(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00177-2023. eCollection 2023 May.
2
Cost-effectiveness of the School-Based Asthma Therapy (SBAT) program.基于学校的哮喘治疗(SBAT)计划的成本效益。
Pediatrics. 2013 Mar;131(3):e709-17. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1883. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
3
Cost-effectiveness of a nurse-led telemonitoring intervention based on peak expiratory flow measurements in asthmatics: results of a randomised controlled trial.
基于呼气峰值流量测量的护士主导远程监测干预对哮喘患者的成本效益:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2007 Jul 27;5:10. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-5-10.
4
Education and follow-up.教育与随访。
CMAJ. 2005 Sep 13;173(6 Suppl):S51-5.
5
Economic assessment of adjustable maintenance treatment with budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler versus fixed treatment in asthma.布地奈德/福莫特罗单吸入器可调维持治疗与哮喘固定治疗的经济学评估
Pharmacoeconomics. 2005;23(7):723-31. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200523070-00006.
6
Assessing the quality and contents of asthma-related information on the Korean internet as an educational material for patients.评估韩国互联网上哮喘相关信息作为患者教育材料的质量和内容。
J Korean Med Sci. 2004 Jun;19(3):364-8. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2004.19.3.364.
7
Guided self management of asthma--how to do it.哮喘的自我管理指导——如何进行
BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):759-60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.759.