Suppr超能文献

高剂量治疗中的急性体内耐药性。

Acute in vivo resistance in high-dose therapy.

作者信息

Teicher B A, Ara G, Keyes S R, Herbst R S, Frei E

机构信息

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 1998 Feb;4(2):483-91.

PMID:9516940
Abstract

In the design of sequential high-dose chemotherapy regimens, the selection of antitumor alkylating agents to be included in each intensification and the interval between the intensifications are critical to the design of the therapy. The tumor cell survival assay and tumor growth delay assay using the murine EMT-6 mammary carcinoma were used as a solid tumor model in which to address these issues. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with high-dose melphalan or cyclophosphamide followed 7 or 12 days later by melphalan, cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, or carboplatin. After treatment with melphalan both 7 and 12 days later, the tumor was resistant to each of the four drugs studied. After treatment with cyclophosphamide both 7 and 12 days later, the tumor was resistant to melphalan and thiotepa but was not resistant to cyclophosphamide or carboplatin. To extend the interval between high-dose treatments to 14 and 21 days, after the first intensification the tumor was transferred to second hosts that were either drug-treated or not drug treated. When high-dose melphalan-treated tumors were treated with a second high dose of melphalan, the tumors were very resistant with the 14-day interval and less resistant with the 21-day interval. This small effect was evident in the bone marrow colony-forming unit, granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM), except in the hosts pretreated with melphalan. When high-dose cyclophosphamide-treated tumors were treated with a second high dose of cyclophosphamide, drug resistance was observed both with the 14-day and 21-day interval if the host was non-pretreated or was pretreated with melphalan, but not if the host was pretreated with cyclophosphamide. The same was true in the bone marrow CFU-GM. Tumor growth delay studies supported these findings in that treatment with high-dose cyclophosphamide, melphalan, thiotepa, and carboplatin resulted in less than additive tumor growth delay, whereas treatment with high-dose cyclophosphamide prior to treatment with high-dose melphalan, cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, or carboplatin resulted in additivity to greater-than-additive tumor growth delay. High-dose combination regimens required dose reduction of the drugs, which resulted in decreased tumor growth delays.

摘要

在序贯大剂量化疗方案的设计中,每次强化治疗中抗肿瘤烷化剂的选择以及强化治疗之间的间隔对于治疗方案的设计至关重要。使用小鼠EMT - 6乳腺癌的肿瘤细胞存活试验和肿瘤生长延迟试验作为实体瘤模型来解决这些问题。荷瘤小鼠先接受大剂量美法仑或环磷酰胺治疗,7或12天后再接受美法仑、环磷酰胺、噻替派或卡铂治疗。在分别于7天和12天后接受美法仑治疗后,肿瘤对所研究的四种药物均产生耐药性。在分别于7天和12天后接受环磷酰胺治疗后,肿瘤对美法仑和噻替派产生耐药性,但对环磷酰胺或卡铂不产生耐药性。为了将大剂量治疗之间的间隔延长至14天和21天,在首次强化治疗后,将肿瘤移植到接受或未接受药物治疗的第二组宿主中。当用第二次大剂量美法仑治疗经大剂量美法仑治疗过的肿瘤时,14天间隔时肿瘤耐药性很强,21天间隔时耐药性较弱。这种微小的效应在骨髓集落形成单位、粒细胞 - 巨噬细胞(CFU - GM)中很明显,但在用美法仑预处理的宿主中除外。当用第二次大剂量环磷酰胺治疗经大剂量环磷酰胺治疗过的肿瘤时,如果宿主未预处理或用美法仑预处理,14天和21天间隔时均观察到耐药性,但如果宿主用环磷酰胺预处理则未观察到耐药性。骨髓CFU - GM中情况也是如此。肿瘤生长延迟研究支持了这些发现,即大剂量环磷酰胺、美法仑、噻替派和卡铂治疗导致的肿瘤生长延迟小于相加效应,而在大剂量美法仑、环磷酰胺、噻替派或卡铂治疗前先用大剂量环磷酰胺治疗则导致相加至大于相加的肿瘤生长延迟。大剂量联合方案需要降低药物剂量,这导致肿瘤生长延迟减少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验