Branicki F J, Law S Y, Fok M, Poon R T, Chu K M, Wong J
Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong Medical Centre, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam.
Arch Surg. 1998 Mar;133(3):316-22. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.133.3.316.
To evaluate quality-of-life (QOL) parameters in patients undergoing esophagectomy, curative or palliative, for carcinoma.
Nonconsecutive case series.
Eighty-eight patients who underwent esophagectomy for cancer (curative, n=49 [56%]; palliative, n=39 [44%]) provided QOL assessments over an 18-month period.
Procedures for referral care were performed by a single team of clinicians in a tertiary referral center. Evaluations of QOL were made by 1 independent trained investigator.
Data were documented by questionnaire at interview and parameters evaluated included an esophageal module for the type and quantity of food intake, severity of related symptoms on eating, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Groups (ECOG) performance status, sleep, pain, leisure activity, working capacity, outlook on life, general well-being, and support from family and friends. A summation of selected parameters was used to calculate a total score.
Significant improvements were recorded in both the curative and palliative groups for at least 1 year following surgery in the type (P<.03) and quantity (P<.03) of food intake and severity of diet-related symptoms (P<.02), when compared with preoperative considerations. Findings were comparable between the groups with regard to dietary intake. Pain status and total scores were worse in the palliative group at 9 months postoperatively but no significant differences between the groups were evident at any time for sleep, leisure activity, and ECOG performance status.
To our knowledge, there are no previous data regarding a comparison of QOL considerations in patients who have undergone either potentially curative or palliative esophagectomy for malignant disease. Data analysis revealed that palliative esophagectomy provided enhanced QOL with marked symptomatic benefits and enjoyment of daily living comparable to that observed following curative resection.
评估因癌症接受根治性或姑息性食管切除术患者的生活质量(QOL)参数。
非连续病例系列。
88例因癌症接受食管切除术的患者(根治性手术,n = 49 [56%];姑息性手术,n = 39 [44%])在18个月期间进行了QOL评估。
转诊护理程序由三级转诊中心的单一临床医生团队执行。QOL评估由1名独立的经过培训的调查员进行。
通过访谈时的问卷记录数据,评估的参数包括食管模块,用于评估食物摄入的类型和数量、进食相关症状的严重程度、东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态、睡眠、疼痛、休闲活动、工作能力、生活展望、总体幸福感以及来自家人和朋友的支持。使用选定参数的总和计算总分。
与术前情况相比,根治性组和姑息性组在术后至少1年的食物摄入类型(P <.03)、数量(P <.03)以及饮食相关症状的严重程度(P <.02)方面均有显著改善。两组在饮食摄入方面的结果相当。姑息性组术后9个月时疼痛状态和总分较差,但在睡眠、休闲活动和ECOG体能状态方面,两组在任何时候均无明显差异。
据我们所知,以前没有关于对因恶性疾病接受潜在根治性或姑息性食管切除术患者的QOL考虑进行比较的数据。数据分析显示,姑息性食管切除术可提高QOL,具有明显的症状改善,且日常生活的愉悦感与根治性切除术后观察到的相当。