Mitchell D Y, Eusebio R A, Dunlap L E, Pallone K A, Nesbitt J D, Russell D A, Clay M E, Bekker P J
Clinical Pharmacology & Pharmacokinetics Department, Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Cincinnati, Ohio 45242-1434, USA.
Pharm Res. 1998 Feb;15(2):228-32. doi: 10.1023/a:1011910517200.
Two studies were conducted to compare the absorption of risedronate administered as a solution to three different gastrointestinal sites (study A) and to determine the extent of absorption of risedronate solution administered by rapid and slow infusion to the second part of the duodenum (study B).
Each study was designed as a single-dose, crossover (three periods, study A; two periods, study B) trial in healthy male subjects, with a 14-day washout period between dosing. Subjects fasted overnight before drug administration and for 4 hours after drug administration. In study A, a risedronate solution of 40 mg in 30 mL of water was administered directly into the stomach, the second part of the duodenum, or the terminal ileum over 1 minute via a nasoenteral tube in a three-period crossover design. In study B, a risedronate solution of 40 mg in 30 mL of water was administered directly into the second part of the duodenum over 1 minute and over 1 hour in a randomized, two-period crossover design. Serum and urine samples were obtained for 48 hours after dosing for risedronate analysis.
Eight subjects completed each study. No statistically significant site-specific differences in any pharmacokinetic parameter were observed (study A). Based on the area under the serum concentration-time profile and the amount of drug excreted in the urine unchanged, the extent of risedronate absorption did not differ significantly following a rapid or a slow infusion (study B). Only minor symptomatic complaints were reported by subjects, such as headaches and body aches.
These studies indicate that the rate and extent of risedronate absorption are independent of the site of administration along the gastrointestinal tract, and that the extent of absorption is not affected by the rate of administration.
进行了两项研究,以比较作为溶液给药的利塞膦酸盐在三个不同胃肠道部位的吸收情况(研究A),并确定快速和缓慢输注至十二指肠第二部的利塞膦酸盐溶液的吸收程度(研究B)。
每项研究均设计为健康男性受试者的单剂量、交叉试验(研究A为三个阶段;研究B为两个阶段),给药间隔为14天的洗脱期。受试者在给药前禁食过夜,并在给药后禁食4小时。在研究A中,采用三阶段交叉设计,通过鼻肠管在1分钟内将30 mL水中含40 mg的利塞膦酸盐溶液直接注入胃、十二指肠第二部或回肠末端。在研究B中,采用随机、两阶段交叉设计,将30 mL水中含40 mg的利塞膦酸盐溶液在1分钟内和1小时内直接注入十二指肠第二部。给药后48小时采集血清和尿液样本进行利塞膦酸盐分析。
每项研究均有8名受试者完成。未观察到任何药代动力学参数存在统计学上的显著部位特异性差异(研究A)。根据血清浓度-时间曲线下面积和尿液中未变化药物的排泄量,快速或缓慢输注后利塞膦酸盐的吸收程度无显著差异(研究B)。受试者仅报告了轻微的症状性不适,如头痛和身体疼痛。
这些研究表明,利塞膦酸盐的吸收速率和程度与胃肠道给药部位无关,且吸收程度不受给药速率的影响。