Hatsukami D K, Boyle R G
University of Minnesota, Department of Psychiatry, Minneapolis 55455, USA.
Adv Dent Res. 1997 Sep;11(3):342-9. doi: 10.1177/08959374970110030601.
A review of the literature examining school-based prevention and treatment intervention programs for smokeless tobacco users is provided. Although few school-based prevention studies have been conducted, the results are promising. Many of the treatment studies that have been conducted, thus far, are limited due to the sample size and the lack of a control group. However, of the studies that have not had these limitations, the results are also promising. In general, studies show that intervention in the dental office can be effective and that group behavioral treatment may also improve cessation rates over minimal contact. On the other hand, pharmacological treatment, which has primarily focused on 2 mg nicotine gum, has not been found to be an effective treatment. Dentists are in an ideal position to advise and assist smokeless tobacco users to quit. The majority of smokeless tobacco users want advice and help from their dentists, and a significant number indicate that discussion of the negative oral effects from the use of smokeless tobacco has an impact on their desire to quit.
本文对针对无烟烟草使用者的校内预防和治疗干预项目的文献进行了综述。尽管针对校内预防的研究开展得较少,但结果很有前景。到目前为止,许多已开展的治疗研究由于样本量和缺乏对照组而受到限制。然而,在没有这些限制的研究中,结果也很有前景。总体而言,研究表明在牙科诊所进行干预可能有效,并且团体行为治疗可能也会比最低限度接触更能提高戒烟率。另一方面,主要集中于2毫克尼古丁口香糖的药物治疗尚未被发现是一种有效的治疗方法。牙医处于为无烟烟草使用者提供建议和帮助其戒烟的理想位置。大多数无烟烟草使用者希望从他们的牙医那里获得建议和帮助,并且相当多的人表示,关于使用无烟烟草对口腔产生的负面影响的讨论对他们的戒烟意愿有影响。