Czubak J, Kotwicki T, Ponitek T, Skrzypek H
Department of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Karol Marcinkowsi University of Medical Sciences of Poznañ, Poland.
Acta Orthop Scand. 1998 Feb;69(1):21-4. doi: 10.3109/17453679809002349.
We compared ultrasound measurements using the Graf and Terjesen methods in 657 newborns. The alpha angle and femoral head coverage (FHC) were analyzed. The rate of DDH was 3.9%, according to Graf and 2.9%, according to Terjesen. The spontaneous increases in alpha angle and FHC were 5 degrees and 7%, respectively, during the first 2 months. Good accordance between the two methods was shown. A few hips were normal, according to one method and were subluxated, according to the other one. The methods gave similar results, except the percentage of "immature hips" IIa (29%) and "possible dysplastic hips" (14%). This might be a sign of better specificity of the Terjesen method. Good interosberver agreement and simple classification favor use of the Terjesen method. The method of Graf is the most commonly used and gives adequate evaluation of the hip, if the method of examination and rather complicated classification are followed closely.
我们对657名新生儿使用格拉夫(Graf)法和特尔耶森(Terjesen)法进行超声测量,并分析了α角和股骨头覆盖率(FHC)。根据格拉夫法,髋关节发育不良(DDH)的发生率为3.9%,根据特尔耶森法为2.9%。在出生后的前两个月,α角和FHC分别自然增加了5度和7%。两种方法显示出良好的一致性。少数髋关节根据一种方法判断为正常,而根据另一种方法则为半脱位。除了IIa型“不成熟髋关节”(29%)和“可能发育异常髋关节”(14%)的百分比外,两种方法得出的结果相似。这可能表明特尔耶森法具有更高的特异性。良好的观察者间一致性和简单的分类有利于特尔耶森法的使用。格拉夫法是最常用的方法,如果严格遵循检查方法和相当复杂的分类,它能对髋关节进行充分评估。