McHale J P, Rasmussen J L
Department of Psychology, Clark University, Worcester, MA 01610, USA.
Dev Psychopathol. 1998 Winter;10(1):39-59. doi: 10.1017/s0954579498001527.
This study examines longitudinal correlates of coparental and family group-level dynamics during infancy. Thirty-seven couples observed at play with their 8-11-month-old infants (15 boys, 22 girls) rated their child's internalizing and externalizing symptoms, and their own coparenting behavior 3 years later. Teachers also rated child behavior at the 3-year follow-up. Several significant relationships emerged between observed family process (high hostility-competitiveness, low family harmony, and high parenting discrepancies in the triad) at Time 1, and subsequent reports of child and coparenting behavior at Time 2. Larger parenting discrepancies at Time 1 predicted greater child anxiety as rated by teachers; greater hostility-competitiveness and lower harmony forecast higher child aggression. Time 1 family process continued to predict Time 2 aggression even after controlling for individual and marital functioning. Several links were also found between distressed family process and later parental reports of negative coparenting behavior. These parental reports of coparenting also explained unique variance in concurrent child behavior ratings. The significance of coparenting as a distinct family construct is discussed.
本研究考察了婴儿期共同养育及家庭群体层面动态变化的纵向关联因素。对37对夫妇及其8至11个月大的婴儿(15名男孩,22名女孩)玩耍时的情况进行观察,并在3年后让他们对孩子的内化和外化症状以及自身的共同养育行为进行评分。教师也在3年随访时对孩子的行为进行评分。在观察到的第1阶段家庭过程(高敌意-竞争性、低家庭和谐度以及三人组中高养育差异)与第2阶段随后报告的孩子及共同养育行为之间出现了若干显著关系。第1阶段更大的养育差异预示着教师评定的孩子更高的焦虑水平;更高的敌意-竞争性和更低的和谐度预示着孩子更高的攻击性。即使在控制了个体和婚姻功能之后,第1阶段的家庭过程仍能预测第2阶段的攻击性。在苦恼的家庭过程与后来父母报告的消极共同养育行为之间也发现了若干联系。这些父母关于共同养育的报告也解释了同时期孩子行为评分中的独特差异。本文讨论了共同养育作为一种独特家庭结构的重要性。