Olsen H, Hjortdal J O, Ehlers N
Department of Ophthalmology, Arhus University Hospital, Arhus C, Denmark.
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1997 Dec;75(6):629-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.1997.tb00619.x.
To investigate the accuracy and precision of automated keratometry, automated refractometry, and computerized corneal topography in estimating the subjective refractive outcome of photo-astigmatic refractive keratectomy six months postoperatively.
Photo-astigmatic refractive keratectomy (Aesculap-Meditec, MEL-60 Excimer Laser) was performed on 26 eyes with a preoperative myopia ranging from -4.0 to 7.6 dioptres, and a naturally occurring astigmatism from 0.75 to 5.0 dioptres. Six months postoperatively refractive outcome was evaluated by automated keratometry, automated refractometry (Nikon NRK-8000), computerized topography (TMS-1), and subjective refraction. Estimate errors were computed as the difference between the change in subjective refraction and the change in automated keratometry, automated refractometry, and surface topography, respectively. Astigmatic changes were evaluated by the second harmonic component in the Fourier series analysis.
Subjective spherical as well as cylindrical values were reduced significantly six months postoperatively. The estimate error (mean +/- one standard deviation) for automated keratometry was -1.26 +/- 0.72 dioptres for the spherical equivalent and -1.36 +/- 1.02 dioptres for the cylinder; for automated refractometry it was -0.78 +/- 0.91 dioptres for the spherical equivalent and -0.66 +/- 0.92 dioptres for the cylinder. The best estimates of subjective changes were obtained when the average of ring 2 and 3 of the topographic data was used: -0.15 +/- 0.82 dioptres for the spherical equivalent and -0.78 +/- 0.80 dioptres for the cylinder.
The computerized topographer with the Fourier analysis was superior to automated keratometry and automated refractometry in estimating the subjective spherical refractive outcome and comparable to automated refractometry in estimating the subjective cylinder refractive outcome after photo-astigmatic refractive keratectomy.
研究自动角膜曲率计、自动验光仪和计算机化角膜地形图在估计散光性屈光性角膜切削术后6个月主观屈光结果方面的准确性和精确性。
对26只眼进行散光性屈光性角膜切削术(蛇牌-美迪泰克,MEL-60准分子激光),术前近视度数为-4.0至7.6屈光度,自然散光度数为0.75至5.0屈光度。术后6个月,通过自动角膜曲率计、自动验光仪(尼康NRK-8000)、计算机化地形图(TMS-1)和主观验光评估屈光结果。估计误差分别计算为主观验光变化与自动角膜曲率计、自动验光仪和表面地形图变化之间的差异。通过傅里叶级数分析中的二次谐波分量评估散光变化。
术后6个月,主观球镜度和柱镜度均显著降低。自动角膜曲率计的估计误差(平均值±1个标准差),等效球镜度为-1.26±0.72屈光度,柱镜度为-1.36±1.02屈光度;自动验光仪的等效球镜度为-0.78±0.91屈光度,柱镜度为-0.66±0.92屈光度。当使用地形图数据的第2环和第3环的平均值时,获得了最佳主观变化估计值:等效球镜度为-0.15±0.82屈光度,柱镜度为-0.78±0.80屈光度。
在估计散光性屈光性角膜切削术后主观球镜屈光结果方面,采用傅里叶分析的计算机化地形图仪优于自动角膜曲率计和自动验光仪,在估计主观柱镜屈光结果方面与自动验光仪相当。