Suppr超能文献

抗心律失常治疗的当前治疗建议。

Current treatment recommendations in antiarrhythmic therapy.

作者信息

Van Gelder I C, Brügemann J, Crijns H J

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, University Hospital Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Drugs. 1998 Mar;55(3):331-46. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199855030-00002.

Abstract

Over the past decade, various studies have demonstrated that class I antiarrhythmic drugs should be avoided in patients with heart failure, cardiac ischaemia or a previous myocardial infarction. In contrast, class II drugs (beta-blockers) reduce morbidity and may even lower mortality in patients suffering from moderate to severe heart failure. In these patients, careful titration of the drug dosage, frequently during hospital admission, may be necessary. If in the setting of heart failure ventricular arrhythmias are symptomatic and/or sustained, patients can be treated effectively, after appropriate treatment of the underlying disease, with the class III drug amiodarone. Unfortunately, this drug does not lower overall mortality, implying that prophylactic institution of amiodarone is not indicated. Pure class III antiarrhythmic drugs like d-sotalol, ibutilide and dofetilide show a high rate of torsade de pointes. Currently, only ibutilide has been approved for clinically monitored intravenous administration. Class IV drugs, the calcium channel blockers, are still very useful for rate control of atrial fibrillation and conversion or prevention of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardias and circus movement tachycardias using a (concealed) bypass tract. Finally, an implantable cardioverter defibrillator seems to improve overall survival in patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. This may imply that an increasing number of patients will be candidates for such a device. However, it will be necessary to await publication of data involving these devices from current ongoing studies.

摘要

在过去十年中,多项研究表明,心力衰竭、心肌缺血或既往有心肌梗死的患者应避免使用Ⅰ类抗心律失常药物。相比之下,Ⅱ类药物(β受体阻滞剂)可降低中度至重度心力衰竭患者的发病率,甚至可能降低死亡率。对于这些患者,可能需要在住院期间仔细调整药物剂量。如果在心力衰竭的情况下,室性心律失常有症状和/或持续,在对基础疾病进行适当治疗后,患者可用Ⅲ类药物胺碘酮进行有效治疗。不幸的是,这种药物并不能降低总体死亡率,这意味着不建议预防性使用胺碘酮。像d-索他洛尔、伊布利特和多非利特这样的纯Ⅲ类抗心律失常药物显示出较高的尖端扭转型室速发生率。目前,只有伊布利特已被批准用于临床监测下的静脉给药。Ⅳ类药物,即钙通道阻滞剂,对于控制房颤的心率以及使用(隐匿性)旁路通道转复或预防房室结折返性心动过速和环形运动性心动过速仍然非常有用。最后,植入式心脏复律除颤器似乎可提高危及生命的室性心律失常患者的总体生存率。这可能意味着越来越多的患者将适合使用这种装置。然而,有必要等待当前正在进行的研究中涉及这些装置的数据公布。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验