Hopkins K, Chandler C, Eatough J, Moss T, Kemshead J T
Paediatric and Neuro-Oncology Group, Frenchay Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Mar 1;40(4):835-44. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00915-2.
Previously we have demonstrated that radioimmunoconjugates can be injected into glioma resection cavities to deliver a boost of radiation to the cavity edge with little toxicity to the normal brain. In the mathematical models we have previously published to assist in the development of this strategy we assumed that antibody remains associated with the cavity edge and no diffusion occurs. However, moderate diffusion might be beneficial while, if this were excessive, it would decrease the therapeutic index markedly.
Selected individuals with relapsed malignant glioma underwent further surgical debulking; 90Y MoAb radioimmunotherapy; and open biopsy to determine the extent to which the conjugate diffuses from the cavity edge. Samples from these patients were taken in radial tracts and the corrected activity in each sample was plotted against distance from the cavity wall to determine appropriate diffusion constants.
Our data indicates that diffusion of radioimmunoconjugate from the edge of a glioma resection cavity appears to be an exponential process. The mean Ro for each patients data set ranged from 0.48-0.63 (overall mean 0.6) cm. A dosimetric model was developed that translates these measurements into estimates of radiation dose. Applying the clinical data to this model indicates that, in each patient, the peak dose is delivered 0.16-0.18 cm below the cavity margin, and the mean dose at 2 cm deep is 5.3% (4.4-5.8%) of the peak.
The model described can be used to translate diffusion constants measured by any method into estimates of absorbed radiation dose. Assuming similar diffusion kinetics, it can also be used to predict the dose deposited if alternative radionuclides are linked to MoAb, although the effect of dose rate should also be considered. In the future, it may be possible to manipulate diffusion by using either different antibodies or antibody fragments for intracavity radioimmunotherapy. Before this can be done, however, further data are needed and a noninvasive approach to measuring diffusion would clearly be optimal.
此前我们已证明,可将放射免疫缀合物注入胶质瘤切除腔内,以向腔边缘提供增强辐射,而对正常脑组织的毒性很小。在我们之前发表的用于辅助制定该策略的数学模型中,我们假设抗体仍与腔边缘相关联且无扩散发生。然而,适度扩散可能是有益的,而如果扩散过度,则会显著降低治疗指数。
选择复发性恶性胶质瘤患者进行进一步手术减瘤、90Y 单克隆抗体放射免疫治疗,并进行开放活检以确定缀合物从腔边缘扩散的程度。从这些患者中沿径向采集样本,并将每个样本的校正活性相对于距腔壁的距离作图,以确定合适的扩散常数。
我们的数据表明,放射免疫缀合物从胶质瘤切除腔边缘的扩散似乎是一个指数过程。每个患者数据集的平均 Ro 范围为 0.48 - 0.63(总体平均 0.6)厘米。开发了一个剂量学模型,可将这些测量值转化为辐射剂量估计值。将临床数据应用于该模型表明,在每个患者中,峰值剂量在腔边缘下方 0.16 - 0.18 厘米处传递,在 2 厘米深处的平均剂量为峰值的 5.3%(4.4 - 5.8%)。
所描述的模型可用于将通过任何方法测量的扩散常数转化为吸收辐射剂量估计值。假设扩散动力学相似,它还可用于预测如果将替代放射性核素与单克隆抗体连接时沉积的剂量,不过也应考虑剂量率的影响。未来,或许有可能通过使用不同抗体或抗体片段进行腔内放射免疫治疗来控制扩散。然而,在此之前,还需要更多数据,并且一种测量扩散的非侵入性方法显然将是最佳的。