Suppr超能文献

儿童顺向和逆向研究中腓肠神经和桡神经感觉神经动作电位的波幅

Amplitudes of sural and radial sensory nerve action potentials in orthodromic and antidromic studies in children.

作者信息

Melendrez J L, MacMillan L J, Vajsar J

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Jan-Feb;38(1):47-50.

PMID:9532433
Abstract

Several previous studies of adults have reported that the amplitudes of the sural and superficial radial nerve action potentials (SN and SRN SNAP respectively) are larger with antidromic than with orthodromic recordings. However, this difference has not been documented in children. This study evaluated the amplitudes of SN and SRN SNAPs obtained with antidromic and orthodromic recordings in children with and without neuropathy and compared these data with findings in adults. The SN or SRN or both of 10 neurologically normal children, 6 children with neuropathy and 7 healthy adults were studied with surface stimulation and recording. The position of the stimulating and recording electrodes for the orthodromic recordings was the reverse of that for the antidromic recordings. Peak-to-peak SNAP amplitudes were measured and analyzed. The mean of the SRN SNAP amplitude was significantly higher with the antidromic than the orthodromic technique for the first and third groups (p < 0.05). The mean SN SNAP amplitude was higher in the three groups, but not statistically significant when the data for the children and adult normal groups were combined and reanalyzed (p < 0.05). Consistent responses were obtained with both techniques. However, the antidromic technique was superior to the orthodromic technique because of the greater amplitude of responses. We recommend the use of the antidromic technique because of its greater amplitudes, ease of use and potential reduction of discomfort to the patient.

摘要

此前针对成年人的多项研究报告称,腓肠神经和桡浅神经动作电位(分别为SN和SRN SNAP)的波幅,在逆向记录时比顺向记录时更大。然而,儿童中的这种差异尚无文献记载。本研究评估了在有或无神经病变的儿童中,通过逆向和顺向记录获得的SN和SRN SNAP的波幅,并将这些数据与成年人的研究结果进行比较。对10名神经功能正常的儿童、6名患有神经病变的儿童和7名健康成年人的SN或SRN或两者进行了表面刺激和记录研究。顺向记录时刺激电极和记录电极的位置与逆向记录时相反。测量并分析了峰峰值SNAP波幅。对于第一组和第三组,SRN SNAP波幅的平均值在逆向记录时显著高于顺向记录(p<0.05)。三组中SN SNAP波幅的平均值均较高,但将儿童和成人正常组的数据合并重新分析时,差异无统计学意义(p<0.05)。两种技术均获得了一致的反应。然而,由于反应波幅更大,逆向技术优于顺向技术。鉴于其更大的波幅、易于使用以及可能减少患者的不适感,我们建议使用逆向技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验