Amos W, Harwood J
School of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, University of St Andrews, Fife, UK.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Feb 28;353(1366):177-86. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0200.
Genetic variability is the clay of evolution, providing the base material on which adaptation and speciation depend. It is often assumed that most interspecific differences in variability are due primarily to population size effects, with bottlenecked populations carrying less variability than those of stable size. However, we show that population bottlenecks are unlikely to be the only factor, even in classic case studies such as the northern elephant seal and the cheetah, where genetic polymorphism is virtually absent. Instead, we suggest that the low levels of variability observed in endangered populations are more likely to result from a combination of publication biases, which tend to inflate the level of variability which is considered 'normal', and inbreeding effects, which may hasten loss of variability due to drift. To account for species with large population sizes but low variability we advance three hypotheses. First, it is known that certain metapopulation structures can result in effective population sizes far below the census size. Second, there is increasing evidence that heterozygous sites mutate more frequently than equivalent homozygous sites, plausibly because mismatch repair between homologous chromosomes during meiosis provides extra opportunities to mutate. Such a mechanism would undermine the simple relationship between heterozygosity and effective population size. Third, the fact that related species that differ greatly in variability implies that large amounts of variability can be gained or lost rapidly. We argue that such cases are best explained by rapid loss through a genome-wide selective sweep, and suggest a mechanism by which this could come about, based on forced changes to a control gene inducing coevolution in the genes it controls. Our model, based on meiotic drive in mammals, but easily extended to other systems, would tend to facilitate population isolation by generating molecular incompatabilities. Circumstances can even be envisioned in which the process could provide intrinsic impetus to speciation.
遗传变异性是进化的基石,为适应和物种形成提供了基础材料。人们通常认为,变异性方面的大多数种间差异主要是由种群大小效应导致的,瓶颈种群的变异性低于稳定大小的种群。然而,我们发现种群瓶颈不太可能是唯一的因素,即使在诸如北象海豹和猎豹等经典案例研究中也是如此,在这些案例中几乎不存在遗传多态性。相反,我们认为,在濒危种群中观察到的低变异性水平更有可能是由出版偏差和近亲繁殖效应共同导致的。出版偏差往往会夸大被认为是“正常”的变异性水平,而近亲繁殖效应可能会加速由于漂变导致的变异性丧失。为了解释种群规模大但变异性低的物种,我们提出了三个假设。首先,已知某些集合种群结构会导致有效种群大小远低于普查大小。其次,越来越多的证据表明,杂合位点比等效的纯合位点更容易发生突变,这可能是因为减数分裂期间同源染色体之间的错配修复提供了额外的突变机会。这样的机制会破坏杂合性与有效种群大小之间的简单关系。第三,变异性差异很大的相关物种这一事实意味着大量的变异性可以迅速获得或丧失。我们认为,这种情况最好用全基因组选择性清除导致的快速丧失来解释,并提出了一种可能的机制,这种机制基于对一个控制基因的强制改变,从而诱导其控制的基因发生共同进化。我们的模型基于哺乳动物的减数分裂驱动,但很容易扩展到其他系统,它往往会通过产生分子不相容性来促进种群隔离。甚至可以设想这样的情况,即这个过程可以为物种形成提供内在动力。